philosophyВестник РГГУ Серия «Философия. Социология. Искусствоведение»RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies2073-64012073-6401Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH)10.28995/2073-6401-2023-1-115-137philosophy-541Research ArticleИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕART STUDIESОрганизация сакрального ландшафта и архитектурной планировки народов ОкеанииOrganization of sacred landscape and architectural planning of Oceanic PeoplesБабаевК. В.BabaevK. V.

Кирилл В. Бабаев, доктор филологических наук, профессор

119435, Москва, Нахимовский пр., д. 32

Kirill V. Babaev, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor

bld. 32, Nakhimovskii Avenue, Moscow, 119435

kbabaev@gmail.comИнститут Китая и современной Азии РАНРоссияRussian Academy of Sciences Institute of China and Contemporary AsiaRussian Federation20230505202301115137Copyright © Бабаев К.В., 20232023Бабаев К.В.Babaev K.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://philosophy.rsuh.ru/jour/article/view/541

Статья посвящена описанию и анализу методов и форм организации сакрального ландшафта и религиозной архитектуры автохтонных народов Тихого океана, подлежащих сопоставлению с древнейшими формами архитектурного творчества народов и цивилизаций Евразии и Австралии. В частности, анализируются такие элементы религиозной архитектуры народов Полинезии, как общинные дома маори в Новой Зеландии, мегалитические сооружения острова Пасхи, а также площадки мараэ для проведения ритуальных церемоний на островах Полинезии. В работе выдвигается гипотеза, что некоторые из элементов древнейшего сакрального ландшафта региона могут считаться универсальными для развития человеческой духовной культуры. В частности, подобные формы могли послужить прообразом древнейших сакральных сооружений и архитектуры поселений народов Евразии.

The paper is about the description and analysis of methods and forms of organization of sacred landscape and religious architecture of the autochthonous people of the Pacific, to be compared to the first primitive forms of architectural art in Eurasia and Australia. The article discusses such elements of religious architecture of Polynesian peoples as the communal houses of the Maori of New Zealand, megalithic structures of Easter (Rapa Nui) island, as well as the marae ritual areas in Polynesia. A hypothesis is discussed that some of the elements of the most ancient sacred landscape of the Pacific may be considered universal for the development of human culture and spirituality. Similar forms could be considered as prototypes of the ancient sacred constructions and settlement architecture of Eurasia.

история архитектурырелигиозная архитектураландшафтный дизайнсакральный ландшафтискусство народов Океаниитрадиционное искусствосравнительно-исторический методhistory of architecturereligious architecturelandscape designsacred landscapeOceanic artMaori arttraditional arthistorical comparison methodReferencesБабаев 2023 – Бабаев К.В. Формы древнейшей сакральной архитектуры народов Австралии // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение. (В печати)Babaev, K.V. (2023), “Forms of the most ancient sacred architecture of the peoples of Australia”, Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History (in print).Квитницкая 1970 – Квитницкая Е.Д. Архитектура острова Пасхи / Ред. О.Х. Халпахчян // Всеобщая история архитектуры. Т. I: Архитектура Древнего мира. М.: Стройиздат, 1970. С. 491–496.Brown, D. (2009), Māori architecture: from fale to wharenui and beyond, Raupo, Auckland, New Zealand.Малиновский 1998 – Малиновский Б. Магия, наука и религия. М.: Рефл-бук, 1998. 304 с.Cauwe, N. (2022), “Platforms in Motion: A Genealogical Architecture”, The Prehistory of Rapa Nui (Easter Island), Rull V., Stevenson C. (eds.), Springer, pp. 237–255.Можайская 2021 – Можайская К.А. Океанийский комплекс мана-тапу и проблема сверхъестественного // Acta Eruditorum. 2021. № 37. С. 100–104.Craig, R. (2004), Handbook of Polynesian mythology, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, USA.Сирк 2008 – Сирк Ю.Х. Австронезийские языки: введение в сравнительно-историческое изучение. М.: Восточная литература, 2008. 480 с.DiNapoli, R. et al. (2020), “Revisiting Warfare, Monument Destruction, and the ‘Huri Moai’ Phase in Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Culture History”, Journal of Pacific Archaeology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–24.Токарев 1965 – Токарев С.А. Религия в истории народов мира. М.: Политиздат, 1965. 582 с.Finney, B. (1977), “Voyaging Canoes and the Settlement of Polynesia”, Science, 196 (4296), pp. 1277–1285.Токарев, Толстов 1956 – Токарев С.А., Толстов С.П. Народы Австралии и Океании. М.: АН СССР, 1956. 851 с.Flenley, J. (2003), The Enigmas of Easter Island: Island on the Edge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Brown 2009 – Brown D. Māori architecture: from fale to wharenui and beyond. Auckland: Raupo, 2009. 267 p.Grinsell, L. (1980), “The Cerne Abbas Giant: 1764–1980”, Antiquity, no. 54 (210), pp. 29–33.Cauwe 2022 – Cauwe N. Platforms in Motion: A Genealogical Architecture // The Prehistory of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) / Ed. by V. Rull, C. Stevenson. Springer, 2022. P. 237–255.Guerin, V. (2017), “The Oceanic subgroup of the Austronesian language family”, Aikhenvald, A. and Dixon, R. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 911–941.Craig 2004 – Craig R. Handbook of Polynesian mythology. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2004. 353 p.Ka’ai, T.M., Higgins, R. (2004). Te ao Māori – Māori world-view. Ki te whaiao: An introduction to Māori culture and society, Ka’ai, T.M., Moorfield, J.C., Reilly, M.P.J. and Mosely, S. (eds.), Pearson Education, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 13–25.DiNapoli 2020 – DiNapoli R. et al. Revisiting Warfare, Monument Destruction, and the ‘Huri Moai’ Phase in Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Culture History // Journal of Pacific Archaeology. 2020. Vol. 12. № 1. Р. 1–24.Kvitnitskaya, E.D. (1979), “Easter Island architecture”, Khalpakhchyan, O.H. (ed.), Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury. T. I: Arkhitektura Drevnego mira [General history of architecture. Vol. I: Architecture of the Ancient World], Stroiizdat, Moscow, Russia, pp. 491–496.Finney 1977 – Finney B. Voyaging Canoes and the Settlement of Polynesia // Science, 196 (4296), 1977. Р. 1277–1285.Lee, J. (2012), “Marae ā-kura: Tracing the birth of marae in schools” Research Information for Teacher, Set 2, pp. 3–11.Flenley 2003 – Flenley J. The Enigmas of Easter Island: Island on the Edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 274 p.Malinovskii, B. (1998), Magiya, nauka i religiya [Magic, science and religion], Refl-buk, Moscow, Russia.Grinsell 1980 – Grinsell L. The Cerne Abbas Giant: 1764–1980 // Antiquity. 1980. № 54 (210). P. 29–33.Mozhaiskaya, K.A. (2021), “The oceanic mana-tapu complex and the issue of the supernatural”, Acta Eruditorum, no. 37, pp. 100–104.Guerin 2017 – Guerin V. The Oceanic subgroup of the Austronesian language family // The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology / Ed. by A. Aikhenvald, R. Dixon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Р. 911–941.McKay, B. and Walmsley, A. (2004), “Māori Architecture 1900–18”, AHA: Architectural History Aotearoa, vol. 1, pp. 57–62.Ka’ai, Higgins 2004 – Ka’ai T.M., Higgins R. Te ao Māori – Māori world-view. Ki te whaiao: An introduction to Māori culture and society / Ed. by T.M. Ka’ai, J.C. Moorfield, M.P.J. Reilly, S. Mosely. Auckland: Pearson Education, 2004. P. 13–25.Memmoth, P. and Keys, C. (2017), “The Emergence of an Architectural Anthropology in Aboriginal Australia: The work of the Aboriginal Environments Research Centre”, Architectural Theory Review, May, pp. 218–236.Lee 2012 – Lee J. Marae ā-kura: Tracing the birth of marae in schools // Set: Research Information for Teacher. 2012. № 2. P. 3–11.Ratana, M. (2021), “Māori architecture: A response to colonization”, Asylum, pp. 128–133.McKay, Walmsley 2004 – McKay B., Walmsley A. Māori Architecture 1900–18 // AHA: Architectural History Aotearoa. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 57–62.Rivers, W.H.R. (1909), “Totemism in Polynesia and Melanesia”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 39, pp. 156–180.Memmoth, Keys 2017 – Memmoth P., Keys C. The Emergence of an Architectural Anthropology in Aboriginal Australia: The work of the Aboriginal Environments Research Centre // Architectural Theory Review. 2017. May. P. 218–236.Salmond, A. (2010), Aphrodite’s Island, University of California, Berkeley, USA.Ratana 2021 – Ratana M. Māori architecture: A response to colonization // Asylum. 2021. P. 128–133.Sirk, I.K. (2008), Avstroneziiskie yazyki: vvedenie v sravnitel’no-istoricheskoe izuchenie [Austronesian Languages: An Introduction to Comparative Historical Studies], Vostochnaya literatura, Moscow, Russia.Rivers 1909 – Rivers W.H.R. Totemism in Polynesia and Melanesia // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1909. P. 156–180.Smith, M. (ed.) (2011), The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Salmond 2010 – Salmond A. Aphrodite’s Island. Berkeley: University of California, 2010. 537 p.Sumarlim, I. (2010). Vernacular Architecture of the South Pacific Islands and the East Indies, Manuscript.Smith 2011 – The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies / Ed. by M. Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 360 p.Tokarev, S.A. (1965), Religiya v istorii narodov mira [Religion in the history of the peoples of the world], Politizdat, Moscow, Russia.Sumarlim 2010 – Sumarlim I. Vernacular Architecture of the South Pacific Islands and the East Indies. Manuscript. 2010. 67 p.Tokarev, S.A. and Tolstov, S.P. (1956), Narody Avstralii i Okeanii [Peoples of Australia and Oceania], USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, USSR.Trigger 1990 – Trigger B.G. Monumental architecture: a thermodynamic explanation of symbolic behaviour // World Archaeology. 1990. № 22. P. 119–132.Trigger, B.G. (1990), “Monumental architecture: a thermodynamic explanation of symbolic behavior”, World Archaeology, no. 22, pp. 119–132.Turner 2005 – Turner T. Garden history: Philosophy and design 2000 BC–2000 AD. New York: Routledge, 2005. 304 p.Turner, T. (2005), Garden history: Philosophy and design 2000 BC – 2000 AD. Routledge, New York, USA.Verkaaik 2013 – Verkaaik O. Preface // Religious Architecture. Anthropological Perspectives / Ed. by O. Verkaaik. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2013. P. 7–24.Verkaaik, O. (2013), “Preface”, Religious Architecture. Anthropological Perspectives. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Yamaguchi 2000 – Yamaguchi T. Сook Island’s Ceremonial Structures: Diversity of Marae and Variety of Meanings: Ph.D. Thesis. Auckland: Auckland University, 2000. 284 p.Yamaguchi, T. (2000), Сook Island’s Ceremonial Structures: Diversity of Marae and Variety of Meanings, Ph.D. Thesis, Auckland University, New Zealand.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.