Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying of value orientations


https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2018-1-65-75

Full Text:




Abstract

The article presents an attempt to compare the concepts “values”and “value orientations”, establish border between them and also synthesize separate scientific developments in order to find the most suitable approach to studying values and value orientations. For that end the paper considers scientific developments of foreign and domestic sociologists who were engaged or continue to be engaged in studying values (E. Durkheim, M. Weber, T. Parsons, U. Thomas and F. Znanetsky, V.A. Yadov, N.I. Lapin, Zh.T. Toshchenko, R. Inglehart, H. Joas). The author makes a try at classification of the scientists’ views on distinctions of the concepts “values” and “valuable orientations” and on functional features of value orientations in the context of social reality.In the conclusion with due account for the developed classification an approach which is most accurately distinguishing the concepts “values” and“valuable orientations” is chosen. Advantages of this approach for empirical researches are described.

About the Author

Tatiana G. Evdokimova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

postgraduate student

bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993



References

1. Weber М. Selected works. Moscow: Progress Publ.; 1990. 808 p. (In Russ.)

2. Parsons T. About social action structure. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ.; 2000. 880 p. (In Russ.)

3. Parsons T. American sociology. V: Osipov GV. editor. Prospects, problems, methods. Moscow: Progress Publ.; 1972. 392 с. (In Russ.)

4. Durkheim E. Sociology. Its subject, method, mission. V: Sociology. Its subject, method, mission. Moscow: Kanon Publ.; 1995. 352 p. (In Russ.)

5. Besmenova IK., Gulevitsch oA. Attitudes and their interrelation with behavior: Abstract review. Moscow: Rossiiskoe psikhologicheskoe obshchestvo Publ.; 1999. 144 p. (In Russ.)

6. Yadov VA. Social stratification in crisis society. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 1994;1:35-52.

7. Fromm E. Anatomy of human disruptiveness. Moscow: Respublika Publ.; 1994. 368 p. (In Russ.)

8. Lapin N.I., Belyaeva L.A., editors. Dynamics of population values in reformed Russia. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ.; 1996. 224 p. (In Russ.)

9. Toshchenko ZhT., editor. Values and valuable orientations. Moscow: YuNITI-DANA Publ.; 2013. p. 103–7. (In Russ.)

10. Andreenkova AV. Materialistic/post-materialistic values in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1994;11:73-81.

11. Joas H. Emergence of values. Moscow: Aleteiya Publ.; 2014. 311 p. (In Russ.)


Supplementary files

For citation: Evdokimova T.G. Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying of value orientations. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2018;(1):65-75. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2018-1-65-75

Views: 349

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)