Preview

Constructivism and digital sculpting

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-1-111-121

Abstract

Through the fusion of modern art and technology, digital sculpture is gradually becoming an important area of historical research of modern art. As a new form of artistic expression, digital sculpture is in a period of conceptualization and separation from traditional sculpture The article analyzes the influence of constructivism on the formation of digital sculpture forms; for example, the works of digital artists Jama Dzhurabaev and Xu Zhelong reflect the application of constructivist principles in digital sculpture.
Through the use of digital technology, their work deconstructs and reorganizes the form and space of traditional sculpture, creating digital sculptures with a sense of dynamism and interactivity. The works not only demonstrate the precision and flexibility of digital technology, but also reflect a constructivist conception of the social construction of knowledge and art forms. In the context of the digital age, digital sculpture is a complex art form that combines temporality and dynamism, which not only challenges the creation and perception of traditional sculpture, but also provides artists with unlimited creative possibilities and experimental space With the continuous progress of digital technology, digital sculpture will continue to explore new artistic expressions and concepts , bringing new changes and development to contemporary art.

About the Author

Sijia Lui
Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design
Russian Federation

Sijia Lv, postgraduate student

bld. 18, Bolshaya Morskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 191186



References

1. Belov, M.I., Mikhailova, A.S. and Nadyrshin, N.M. (2016), “Creative method of Naum Gabo and his influence on the shaping of architecture and art”, Izvestiya Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta, no. 18, pp. 75–82.

2. Chen’, Yunshui and Chzhan, Ven’bo (2023), “From the differences in spatial concepts to the differentiation of forms. Three clues to the spatialization of constructivist art”, Mirovaya arkhitektura, no. 02, p. 083. 陈永帅,张文波. 从空间观念差异到形 式分化–构成主义艺术空间化的三条线索[C]. 世界建筑, 2023(02): 83页.

3. Gabo, N. and Pevsner, A. (2017), “The Realistic Manifesto, 1920”, J.E. Bowlt (ed., tr.), Russian art of the avant-garde theory and criticism 1902–1934, Thames & Hudson, London UK, pp. 208–214.

4. Filicheva, N.V. (2001), “Questions about Russian and Western European art styles in the 1920s and 1930s (constructivism)”, Nauchno-tekhnicheskii vestnik informatsionnykh tekhnologii, mekhaniki i optiki, no. 2, pp. 75–83.

5. Khan-Magomedov, S.O. (2003), Konstruktivizm –kontseptsiya formoobrazovaniya [Constructivism – the concept of shaping], (RAASN), NII teorii arkhitektury i gradostroitel’stva, Stroiizdat, Moscow, Russia.

6. Ren, Yan’ and Tszyan, Bin’ (2018), “Vladimir Tatlin Master of Constructivist Architecture”, Obsledovanie i proektirovanie v Kitae [Surveying and design in China], no. 8, p. 74. 任艳,江滨.弗拉基米尔·塔特林构成主义建筑大师[J].中国勘 察设计,2018 (8): 74 页.

7. Van, Si-Tsi (2021), “The Influence of Compositionalism on Modern Design”, Otsenka iskusstva, no. 6, p. 57. 王司棋. 构成主义对现代设计的影响[C]. 设计艺术研 究,2021 (06): 57 页.

8. Yan, Yan’fan’ (2022), “The Nature of Modernist in the light of constructivism. Design from Compositionalism”, Obsledovanie i proektirovanie v Kitae, no. 02, p. 061. 杨艳 芳. 从构成主义看现代主义设计的本质[C]. 中国勘察设计,2022 (02): 061页。


Review

For citations:


Lui S. Constructivism and digital sculpting. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2025;(1):111-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-1-111-121

Views: 32


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)