The man’s image of the Age of Enlightenment. Portrait of A.Ya. Protasov from the collection of the State Hermitage Museum
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-3-101-115
Abstract
The special development of Enlightenment ideas in Russia, inextricably linked to religious and moral concepts, was reflected in Russian portrait painting of the second half of the 18th century, influencing the conservation of some of its archaic features. The portrait of the statesman A.Ya. Protasov in the cabinet interior conveys information on the most important career achievements of the model, including work in the Legislative Commission of 1767–1768, which united all estates of the Russian Empire in those years. In memory of the event, deputies were presented with a commemorative medal “To the Deputies of the Legislative Commission”, which is found on a number of provincial portraits of the last third of the XVIII century, including the portrait of A.Ya. Protasov. The involvement of various estates in the development of the draft New Code became one of the reasons for strengthening the self-awareness of representatives of the non-noble estates, which contributed to the development of portraiture in the vast Russian provinces. Protasov’s portrait, focused on metropolitan samples, illustrates the contact between metropolitan art and its more archaic branch – provincial portrait – reflecting the trends in the development of Russian art of the New Age.
Keywords
Russian portrait painting of the 18th century,
the Age of En-lightenment,
Russian provincial portrait
Supporting agencies: The author expresses his sincere gratitude to N.Y. Bakhareva, senior researcher at the Department of the History of Russian Culture at the State Hermitage Museum for her help in attributing the medal for the deputies of the Commission for the drafting of the “New Code” depicted in the portrait of A.Ya. Protasov.
About the Author
A. D. Akilova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna D. Akilova
bldg. 6, bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047
References
1. Abramkin, I.A. (2020), “Typological characteristics of ceremonial and chamber image in the Russian portrait painting of 18th century”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies” Series, no. 4, pp. 112–127.
2. Akilova, A.D. (2024), Russian provincial portrait of the second half of the 18th – mid19th century: Features of artistic evolution, PhD Thesis, Moscow, Russia.
3. Evangulova, O.S. and Karev, A.A. (1994), Portretnaya zhivopis’ v Rossii vtoroi poloviny XVIII v. [Portrait painting in Russia in the second half of the 18th century], Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, Russia.
4. Gavrin, V.V. (2004), “ ‘That’s why Urania is older than Clio’: ‘Attributes of scholarship’ in the Russian portrait of the Enlightenment”, Neprikosnovennyi zapas. no. 6 (38), pp. 101–105.
5. Izotova, M. A. (2010), Ordena i medali Rossii i SSSR [Orders and medals of Russia and the USSR], Vladis, Rostov on Don, Russia.
6. Karev, A.A. (2000), Portrait image in the context of Russian Art culture of the 18th century: Interspecific portrait issues at the Turn of Baroque and Classicism, Dr. Sc. Thesis, Moscow, Russia.
7. Karev, A.A. (2003), “On the class ideal in the Russian portrait of the 18th century”, Lomonosov History Journal, no. 6, pp. 72–92.
8. Karev, A.A. (2023), “Portrait painting”, Smirnov, G.K. (ed.), Istoriya russkogo iskusstva, v 22 t. T. 13: Iskusstvo provintsii vtoroi poloviny XVIII veka. V dvukh polutomakh [History of Russian Art. In 22 vols, vol. 13: Provincial Art of the second half of the 18th century: In 2 half vols.], Gosudarstvennyi institut iskusstvoznaniya, Moscow, Russia, pp. 910–953.
9. Kruglov, A.N. (2023a), “Kant’s concept of Enlightenment and its alternatives”, Kantian Journal, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 16–39
10. Kruglov, A.N. (2023b), “The Concept of Enlightenment in Russian Philosophy of the 18th century”, KHRISTIANSKOYE CHTENIYE [Christian Reading], no. 1, pp. 225–245.
11. Kulakova, I.P. (2002), “The cabinet as an attribute of intellectual life”, The Philosophical Age, Almanac 22, Human Sciences in the Modern World, part 2, Saint Petersburg, Russia, pp. 50–55.
12. Kulakova, I.P. (2008), “The history of intellectual life and Russian traditional culture. Father’s Study in childhood impressions (late 18th – early 20th century)”, Kakoreya: Iz istorii detstva v Rossii i drugikh stranakh. Sb. statei i materialov [Kakoreya: From the history of childhood in Russia and other countries: Collection of articles and materials], Moscow, Tver, Russia, pp. 47–61.
13. Lebedev, A.V. (1993), “The age of Enlightenment and the art of portraiture in the Russian province”, Kul’tura epokhi Prosveshcheniya [Culture of the Age of Enlightenment.], pp. 179–211, Moscow, Russia.
14. Yablonskaya, T.V. (1978), Classification of the portrait genre in Russia of the 18th century. On the issue of national specifics, Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow, Russia.
15. Zider, R. (1997), Sotsial’naya istoriya sem’i v Zapadnoi i Tsentral’noi Evrope (konets XVIII – XX v.) [The social history of the family in Western and Central Europe (late 18th – 20th century)], Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Akilova A.D. The man’s image of the Age of Enlightenment. Portrait of A.Ya. Protasov from the collection of the State Hermitage Museum. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2025;(3):101-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-3-101-115
Views:
6
Email this article 