Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

Gender regime in the legal context of the member states of the European Union (content analysis essay)

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-4-112-120

Abstract

Authors carried out the content analysis of the gender regime in the normative legal acts of European intergovernmental organizations; the legislative framework of the member states of the European Union, judicial precedents in the field of implementation and ensuring the rights and opportunities for representatives of trans- and non-binary groups. Statistical data and author’s materials of sociological research were used in the article. Currently, two main, parallel processes are obvious: degenderization and multigenderization. They occur with the visible influence and control of the governments of particular states and intergovernmental organizations. The issue is widely covered and lobbied by European states acting as part of and on behalf of the European Union. However, European countries are heterogeneous in the implementation of gender and sexual equality policies. The ideas promoted by the EU, the intensity and tools can be considered as a mechanism for unification of the European space, ignoring historical, cultural and ideological features, and also calling into question the very statehood and sovereignty of the members of that association.

About the Author

V. G. Ushakova
Saint Petersburg State University
Россия

Valentina G. Ushakova, Сand. of Sci. (History)

bld. 7-9, Universitetskaya Embankment, St. Petersburg, 199034



References

1. Bokting, U.O. et al. (2013), “Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online sample of th0e U.S. transgender population”, American Journal of Public Health, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 943–951.

2. Kanamori, Yu. et al. (2022), “Intergroup contact, intergroup anxiety, and anti-transgender prejudice: A study using structural equation modeling”, Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1–16.

3. Laughlin, G. (2018), “Gender ideology: For a ‘Third Sex’ Without Reserve”, Studies in Christian Ethics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 471–482.

4. Morgenroth, T. and Ryan, M. K. (2021), “The effects of gender trouble: An integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1113–1142.

5. Satcher, M.F. et al (2022), “Exploring Contextual Differences for Sexual Role Strain Among Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men in Lima, Peru”, Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 51, pp. 1–15.

6. Sherriff, N. et al. (2019) “Co-producing knowledge of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) health-care inequalities via rapid reviews of grey literature in 27 EU Member States”, Health Expectations, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 688–700.

7. Ushakova, V.G. (2022), “Sex and Gender. Socio-political aspects of terminological debates”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 1, part 3, pp. 352–362, DOI: 10.28995/2073-6401-2022-1-352-362/

8. Ushakova ,V.G. (2024) “Sex and gender. Aspects of terminological debate”, Pol i gender: aspekty terminologicheskikh debatov [Gender resources of social change], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 63–78.


Review

For citations:


Ushakova V.G. Gender regime in the legal context of the member states of the European Union (content analysis essay). RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2025;(4):112-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-4-112-120

Views: 19

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)