Argument from analogy in understanding “other minds”. To the history of an issue
Abstract
The article traces the origins of “other minds” issue, its connection to the issue of self-awareness, its solving, which was called the argument from analogy. The criticism of the argument by analogy is considered, as well as the attempt of its improvement by Russian philosopher S.A. Askoldov.
About the Author
Vladimir P. Filatov
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Filatov Vladimir P. – Dr. in Philosophy, professor, Russian State University for the Humanities; professor.
Russian Federation
Filatov Vladimir P. – Dr. in Philosophy, professor, Russian State University for the Humanities; professor.
References
1. Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом. Москва: РОССПЭН, 2004. С. 59.
2. Декарт Р. Избранные произведения. Москва: Госполитиздат, 1950. С. 300-302.
3. Райл Г. Понятие сознания. Москва: Идея-Пресс, 1999. С. 24.
4. Mill J.S. An Examination of sir W. Hamilton's Philosophy. London: Longmans, 1867. P. 237.
5. Симонов П.В. О познавательной функции сопереживания//Вопросы философии. 1979. № 9. С. 67.
6. Лосский Н.О. Восприятие чужой душевной жизни//Логос. 1914. Т. 1. Вып. 2.
7. Аскольдов С.А. Аналогия как основной метод познания//Аскольдов С.А. Гносеология: Статьи. Москва: Изд-во Московской Патриархии РПЦ, 2012. С. 129-156.
8. Алексеев С.А. (Аскольдов). Мысль и действительность. Москва: Тип. С.К. Попова, 1914. С. 245-273.
Review
For citations:
Filatov V.P. Argument from analogy in understanding “other minds”. To the history of an issue. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2017;(4/2):181-190. (In Russ.)
Views:
252
Email this article 