Church Discourses and Identity. Application of discursive approaches for sociological study of religious identities in Christian communities
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2018-1-50-64
Abstract
Keywords
About the Author
Ekaterina I. GrishaevaRussian Federation
Ph.D. in Philosophy, associate professor
bld. 51, Lenina prospect, Еkaterinburg, 620003
References
1. Davie G. Believing without Belonging. Is This the Future of Religion in Britain? Social Compass. 1990;37(4):455-469.
2. Moberg M. First-, second-, and third-level discourse analytic approaches in the study of religion: moving from meta-theoretical reflection to implementation in practice. Religion. [Internet] 2013;43(1):4-25 (data obrashcheniya: 22 may 2018). URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0048721X.2013.742742
3. Burr V. Social Constructionosm. London: Routledge Publ.; 2003. 341 p.
4. Dij, T., van. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications Publ.; 1998. 456 p.
5. Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman Publ.; 1995. 235 p.
6. Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso Publ.; 2001. 256 p.
7. Seul JR. ‘Ours is the Way of God’: Religion, Identity, And Intergroup Conflict. Journal of Peace Research. 1999;5:553-69.
8. Foucault М. Will for truth: beyond knowledge, power and sexuality: Works of different years. Moscow: Kastal’ Publ.; 1994. Stat’ya. The Order of Discourse. p. 49–94. (In Russ.)
9. Kelman HC. The place of ethnic identity in the development of personal identity: A challenge for the Jewish family. V: Coping with life and death: Jewish families in the twentieth century. New York; oxford: oxford University Press; 1998;14:3-26.
10. Jorgensen M, Phillips LJ. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Khar’kov: Gumanitarnyi tsentr Publ.; 2008. 354 p. (In Russ.)
11. Hall S. Who needs ‘identity’? V: Identity: A Reader. London: Sage Publ.; 2000. P. 15–30.
12. Berger PL. The sacred canopy. New York: Anchor Publ.; 1967. 240 p.
13. Hamilton BM. The Sociology of religion. Theoretical and comparative perspectives. London; New York: Routledge Publ.; 2003. 235 p.
14. Mol H. Identity and the Sacred: A sketch for A New Social-Scientific Theory of Religion. oxford: Basil Blackwell Publ.; 1976. 326 p.
15. Haar G., ter. Ritual as Communication: A Study of African Christian Communities in the Bijilmer District of Amsterdam. V: Ritual and Religious Belief: A Reader. London: Routledge Publ.; 2005. 345p.
16. Arbuckle GA., von.Catholic Identity or Identities? Refounding Ministries in Chaotic Times. Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 2013. 485 p.
17. Grishaeva EI., Shumkova VA. Conservative model of orthodox identity: based on the analysis of confessional mass media. Vestnik LGU imeni AS. Pushkina. 2017;1:192-203.
Review
For citations:
Grishaeva E.I. Church Discourses and Identity. Application of discursive approaches for sociological study of religious identities in Christian communities. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2018;(1):50-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2018-1-50-64