Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

Issues of the scientometric methods application in measurement of efficiency of the higher school lecturers publication activity

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-2-103-114

Abstract

Article analyzes pluses and minuses of use of a scientometrics for studying the science development. It says about scientometrics sources as parts of science of science in Russia and abroad. It is noted that in the 60th years of the 20th century the use of “Science Citation Index” served as quite effective tool for a research of the science development. Currently, the possibilities of ascientometrics have become significantly wider, it is promoted by information technology development. In parallel with the development of a scientometrics there is the absolutization of quantitative data, formalization and depersonalization of information. Especially it concerns the higher school science. On the basis of a series of deep interviews the author analyzes the higher school teachers and researchers opinions and estimates concerning ascientometrics as the performance criteria for faculty members. It is revealed that practice of applying scientometric methods are often simplified and one-sided. Strict requirements on compliance with scientometric criteria lead to formalization of publication activity. The specific market for services on rising the citation indexes and rendering any “publication services” is formed (preparation and placement of articles in the VAK magazines, SKOPUS and so forth).

About the Author

E. A. Grishina
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Sociology), professor


References

1. Bernal J. Science in history of society. Moscow: Publishing house of foreign literature, 1956. (In Russ.)

2. Prise DJ. de Solla. Science Since Babylon. New Haven, Conn.: YaleUniversity Press, 1961. 149 p. [Internet]. URL: https://www.questia.com/read/334133/sciencesince-babylon (data obrashcheniya 12 March 2019).

3. Nalimov VV. Quantitative methods of a research of development of Science. Voprosy filosofii.1966;12:38-47.

4. Nalimov VV., Mulchenko ZM. Scientometrics. Studying of development of sciences as information process. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1969.

5. Gilyarevsky RS., Mulchenko VM, Terekhin AT., Black AN. Experience of Studying of “Science Citation Index”. Prikladnaya dokumentalistika. Moscow, 1968. P. 39-59.

6. Grishina EA. Scientific intellectuals. Contradictions of social identification. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. 2008;3:34-49.

7. Playing the game of numerature (tsifir’), or How the work of a scientist is nowadays evaluated. Collection of articles on bibliometrics. Moscow: MCCME Publ.; 2011. 72 p.

8. Zhukov D. By what criteria does the state estimates scientific achievements of higher education institution and of the certain scientist? [Internet]. URL: http://nexpol. blogspot.com/2013/12/blog-post_21.html (data obrashcheniya 13 March 2019).

9. Velikaya EV. The model of “National Research University” (by an example of NRU “Higher School of Economics”). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series. 2016;2:112-17. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Grishina E.A. Issues of the scientometric methods application in measurement of efficiency of the higher school lecturers publication activity. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(2):103-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-2-103-114

Views: 221


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)