Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

Is there intersubjectivity at a perceptual level?

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-12-19

Abstract

Intersubjectivity of perception is an important aspect of the general issue of intersubjectivity. The arguments pros and cons for the intersubjectivity of the people perceptual experience, provided in cognitive psychology and in the philosophy of consciousness, are presented. There are a number of cognitive mechanisms that ensure intersubjective perception of the surrounding world by the people. The “reciprocity of perspectives” of perception is taken as a matter of course for social interactions. At an early age, the ability for joint attention and “adopting stranger ‘s point of view” is formed. A matter of the visual experience intersubjectivity is discussed in presumption of the consciousness “transparency”. The similarity of qualitative characteristics of phenomenal experience (“qualia”) is considered in relation to color perception. The perception is basic modality of consciousness, and avoiding intersubjectivity at this level it could hardly be possible to discuss an issue of knowledge on “another consciousness” and other issues related to intersubjectivity of the phenomena of the communication and culture.

About the Author

V. P. Filatov
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Vladimir P. Filatov, Dr. of Sci. (Philosophy), professor

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, 125993;



References

1. Kalinichenko VV. Intersubjectivity. New philosophical encyclopedia. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl Publ.; 2001. 735 p. (In Russ.)

2. Shuts A. Selected works. The world, glowing with sense. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ.; 2004. 1056 p.

3. Piaget J., Inhelder B. The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge, 1956. 490 p.

4. Zotov MV., Andrianova NE., Voyt AP. The role of polyperspective representations in Joint Attention processes. Cultural-historical psychology. 2015;11(2):16-27. (In Russ.)

5. Moll H., Tomasello M. Co-operation and human cognition: The Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 2007. Vol. 362. p. 639-648.

6. Moore J. The refutation of idealism. Yearbook of the history of philosophy. 1987. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1987. P. 247–265. (In Russ.)

7. Harman G. The Intrinsic Quality of Experience. Philosophical Perspectives. J. Tomberlin (ed.). Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Press, 1990. p. 34-49.

8. Martin M. The transparency of experience. Mind & Language. 2002;17(4):376-425.

9. Psychology and culture. Ed. by D. Matsumoto. Saint Petersburg: Peter Publ.; 2003. 718 p. (In Russ.)

10. Locke J. An essay concerning human understanding. Locke J. Works. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl Publ.; 1985. 623 p. (In Russ.)

11. Ivanov DV. Other minds, spectrum inversion and individual language. Philosophy of Science. 2012;17:70-83. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Filatov V.P. Is there intersubjectivity at a perceptual level? RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(1):12-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-12-19

Views: 169


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)