“Roman Circle”: German formalism influence on the Anton Ažbe’s pedagogical method
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-66-75
Abstract
The article discusses an influence of ideas of “Roman Circle” members Konrad Fiedler, Hans von Marées and Adolf von Hildebrand, who stood at the origins of European formalism, on Anton Ažbe’s pedagogical method. For a better understanding of the cultural context and the prerequisites for the emergence of a confrontation of innovative and conservative movements the author outlines the philosophical and artistic situation in Germany in the last third of the 19th century, in particular in its main cultural center – Munich. Somehow or other all “Roman Circle” members were connected with Bavarian capital. They became founders of the theory of the vision and formalist approach, that influenced the art, philosophy, philology throughout Europe. The article deals with K. Fiedler and A. von Hildebrand philosophical ideas and the painter H. von Marées pedagogical approach based on them. At the end of 19th century, the large sector of private art schools was formed in Munich. They acted as an alternative to, and often as a complement to, formal education. Anton Ažbe’s school was one of the most famous private art schools in Munich. As an artist and teacher, he (a Slovenian) experienced a significant influence of formalism, because his artistic development took place during thetheories of formalism heyday and recognition in Munich.
The article compares with concrete examples the theory of vision, the laws of the forms-shaping and the understanding the tasks of art, manifested in the works of C. Fidler, A. Hildebrand, and H. von Marées with the fundamental ideas of the Anton Ažbe’s pedagogical method – “Sphere Principle” and “Crystallization of Color Principle”.
About the Author
Yu. S. MeretskayaRussian Federation
Yulia S. Meretskaya, postgraduate student
bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, 125993
References
1. Grinenko GV. History of philosophy: A Textbook. Moscow: Yurait Publ.; 2004. (In Russ.)
2. Ambrožič K. Wege zur Moderne und die Azbe-Schule in München / Pota k Moderni in Ažbetova šola v Münchnu. Weisbaden–Ljubljana, 1988–1989.
3. Tršar M. Anton Ažbe. Ljubljana: Zalozba Park, 1991.
4. Rosenfeld NB., Favorskiy VA. From the translator. Hildebrand A. The Issue of form in the fine arts and a collection of articles. Transl. by NB. Rosenfeldand VA. Favorskii. Moscow: Musaget, MCMXIIII. (In Russ.)
5. Bakhtin MM. (under the name of VV. Voloshinov) Freudianism. Formal method in literary criticism. Marxism and philosophy of language. Articles. Moscow: Labirint Publ.; 2000. (In Russ.)
6. Barasch M. Theories of art, 3. From impressionism to Kandinsky. New York and London: Routledge, 2000.
7. Vlasov VG. Favorskiy and VKHUTEMAS. Prostranstvo kul’tury: Dom Burganova. 2009; 2. (InRuss.)
8. Grabar IE. My life. Auto-Monography. Moscow; Leningrad: Iskusstvo Publ.; 1937. (In Russ.)
9. Dobuzhinsky MV. Memories. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1987. (In Russ.)
10. Moleva NM., BelyutinEM. Anton Azhbe’s School. On the ways of development of artistic pedagogy at the turn of 19–20 c. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ.; 1958. (In Russ.)
11. Hildebrand A. The issue of form in the fine arts and a collection of articles. Transl. by NB. Rosenfeld and VA. Favorskii. Moscow: Musaget Publ.; MCMXIIII. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Meretskaya Yu.S. “Roman Circle”: German formalism influence on the Anton Ažbe’s pedagogical method. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(1):66-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-66-75