Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

Perception and reception in the theory of art

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-87-97

Abstract

It is known that a man in general and the psyche in particular consist of both the innate and acquired elements. Therefore, everything that we do – including the art and communication – is determined either by the first or second factors. However, in the studies of art, that is usually either not taken into account or not taken into account sufficiently. Such undercount doesn’t make problems in philology, but in the studies on the visual arts, that are deeply rooted in the peculiarities of visual perception, it can lead to significant theoretical losses. Therefore, in art studies, it makes good sense to systematically distinguish between the features of art, based on the innate aspects of perception (perception) and on acquired aspects (reception).

About the Author

S. A. Filippov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Sergei A. Filippov, Cand of Sci. (Art studies)

bldg. 1, bld. 9, Mokhovaya Str., Moscow, Russia, 125009



References

1. Lorenz K. Back side of the Mirror. Experience of the natural history of human knowledge. Lorenz K. The So-called Evil. Moscow: Kul’turnay arevolyutsiya Publ.; 2008. P. 309-586. (In Russ.)

2. Arnheim R. Art and Visual Perception. Moscow: Progress Publ.; 1974. 393 p. (In Russ.)

3. Kulka J. Psychology of Art. Kharkov: Gumanitarnyi tsentr Publ.; 2014. 558 p. (InRuss.)

4. Beauty and a Brain. Biological aspects of aesthetics. Moscow: Mir Publ.; 1995. 335 p. (In Russ.)

5. Goldstein EB. Pictorial Perception and Art. Blackwell Handbook of Perception. Oxford: Blackwell Publ. Ltd., 2001. P. 344-78

6. The Perception of Pictures. Ed. by MA. Hagen. Cambridge (Mass.): Academic Press, 1980. (In 2 vols.)

7. In the Mind’s Eye: Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures, Films, and the World. Ed. by M.A. Peterson, B. Gillam, H.A. Sedgwick. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 2007. 656 p.

8. Ivanov Vyach. Evenand Odd. Asymmetry of the Brain and Sign Systems. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio Publ.; 1978. 184 p. (In Russ.)

9. Lyons J. Language and Linguistics. Introductory Course. Moscow: URSS Publ.; 2004. 317 p. (In Russ.)

10. Pinker S. The Language as an Instinct. Moscow: URSS Publ.; 2004. 456 p. (In Russ.)

11. Kronhaus M. The Life and Fate of the Hypothesis of Linguistic Relativity. Nauka i zhizn’. 2011;8:66-72. (In Russ.)

12. Tsivian Yu. Early Russian Cinema and Its Cultural Reception: 1896–1930. Riga: Zinatne Publ.; 1991. 492 p.

13. Harari Yu. Sapiens. A brief History of Mankind. Moscow: Sindbad Publ.; 2016. 518 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Filippov S.A. Perception and reception in the theory of art. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(1):87-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-87-97

Views: 573


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)