Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

Party system of modern Russia: institutional frames and public legitimization

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-108-119

Abstract

The paper analyses evolution of the party system in Russia in the context of transforming politic regime. I show that institutional frames of party system were initionally determined by the state power and had been changed insensibly in every electoral circle, which led to highly fragmented and nonstable political landscape, where parties are not significant political actors. The parties don’t transform state policy but play important role of legitimization of political regime. The tendency of the atrophy of parliamentary opposition is also analyzed and it is shown how it provokes movements and initiatives of emerging non-system opposition. I prove that party-phobia of Russian citizens apparent in low level of political participation and of trust to the parties in public opinion follows from the weakness of political parties as political institutions and of its decorative character.

About the Author

N. M. Velikaya
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Nataliya M. Velikaya, Dr. of Sci. (Politics), professor

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, Russia, 125993;



References

1. Shakirova EV. The concept of a hybrid political regime in modern political science as an analytical framework for the analysis of Russian policy. Historical, philosophical, political and legal studies, cultural studies and art criticism. Questions of the theory and practice. 2013;6. P. 2: 203-10. (In Russ.)

2. Huntington SP. The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman-London: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.

3. Carothers T. The end of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy. USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002;13(1):5-21.

4. Golosov G. Electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Pro et Contra. Election and political system. 2008;1:22-35. (In Russ.)

5. Nisnevich Yu., Ryabov A. Modern authoritarianism and political ideology. POLIS. Political Studies. 2016;4:162-81. (In Russ.)

6. Levitsky S., Way L. Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

7. Makarenko B., Lokshin I. Modern party systems. Evolution scenarios and development trends. POLIS. Political Studies. 2010;3:85-109. (In Russ.)

8. Golos (The voice). Chronicle of Legislature [Internet]. URL: https://www.golosinfo.org/timeline/ (data obrashcheniya 20 Nov. 2018). (In Russ.)

9. Gelman V. Russian party system transforming. ПОЛИТ.RU. 2008. [Internet]. URL: http://polit.ru/article/2008/03/14/gelman/ (data obrashcheniya 20 Nov. 2018). (In Russ.)

10. FOM (Public Opinion Foundation). Resource of data: «FOMnibus» – All Russia Survey respondents from 18 and older. 19 October 2014. 43 subjects of Russian Federation, 100 settlements, 1500 respondents. Polling at the place of residence. Statistical error not more than 3,6% [Internet]. URL: https://fom.ru/Politika/11785 (data obrashcheniya 20 Nov. 2018). (In Russ.)

11. Challenges of the digital future and sustainable development of Russia. Socialpolitical status and demographical situation in 2017–2018. Collective monograph. / Institute of social-political studies of Russian Academy of Sciences. Ed. by GV. Osipov, SV. Ryasantsev, VR. Levashev, TR. Rostavskaya. Moscow, 2018. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Velikaya N.M. Party system of modern Russia: institutional frames and public legitimization. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(1):108-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-108-119

Views: 273


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)