The labor metamorphoses. Modern interpretations
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-35-45
Abstract
The focus of the article is not an abstract concept of labour, but the precise human labor, identified with professional occupation, the work aimed at maintaining a decent standard of living and personal fulfillment. Attitude to labor, its role in the human life and society are constantly undergoing changes, forcing individuals to vary and to adapt to new working conditions, learning new professions and skills. In addition to the labor metamorphoses in the end of 20th century, connected with trends of post-industrial society, contemporary researchers, facing strengthening of globalization processes, technological progress and further income polarization in early 21st century, fix unprecedented changes in regard to labor relations and new social phenomena which allow even to talk about the «end of labor» in its traditional sense (M.N. Makarova).
Among them the article considers the rise of a new class called precariat and the precarization of labor relations (G. Standing), the concept of two-thirds society, the phenomenon of meaningless jobs (D. Gruber) and downshifting, which, being a voluntary refusal of the career may be one of possible society reactions to useless, time-consuming labor. One of the potential ways to solve some issues mentioned in the article and supported by a great number of scientists, is the introduction of an unconditional basic income.
About the Author
Yu. S. SergeevaRussian Federation
Yunona A. Sergeeva, post-graduate student
bld. 6, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Butonova, N.V. (2012), “Leisure practices in modern culture”, Pushkin LSU Bulletin [Online], no. 1, pp. 201–210, available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dosugovye-praktiki-v-sovremennoy-kulture (Accessed on 25 Aug 2019).
2. Golenkova, Z.T. and Goleusova Y.V. (2013), “New social groups in contemporary stratification systems of global society”, Social science and social practice, no. 3, pp. 5–15.
3. Makarova, M.N. (2007), “End of labor. Myth and reality of post-industrialism” [Online], Economic Sociology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42–52, available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/konets-truda-mif-i-realnost-postindustrializma (Accessed on 13 Apr 2019).
4. Sidorina, T.Yu. (2013), “Question about the labor and meaning of life”] [Online], Voprosy filosofii, no. 11, pp. 3–14, available at: http://vphil.ru/index.php?id=850&option=com_content&task=view (Accessed 21 Apr 2019).
5. Standing, G. (2014), Precariat: novy opasny klass [The precariat: the new dangerous class], Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, Russia.
6. Breakspear, C. and Hamilton C. (2004), “Getting a life: understanding the downshifting phenomenon in Australia”, [Online], The Australian Institute Journal, Discussion paper, no. 62, February, ANU, Canberra, Australia, available at: https://www.tai.org.au/sites/default/files/DP62_8.pdf (Accessed 20 Aug 2019).
7. Graeber, D. (2018), Bullshit jobs, Simon & Schuster, New York, USA.
Review
For citations:
Sergeeva Yu.S. The labor metamorphoses. Modern interpretations. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(3):35-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-35-45