Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

Features of the formation of magistracy in Germany

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-75-85

Abstract

The author of the article make attempt to trace the dynamics of the development of the European magistracy, to identify the features of its formation in the German higher education, compare this experience with the Russian. Оn a basis of the analysis of official documents, statistical data and the results of the surveys conducted by the German researchers, the author shows how under the influence of external and internal factors in Germany, the second level of higher education is formed. In particular, within the framework of expanding the availability of education, not only universities but also professional higher schools received the right to carry out training in master’s programs, which led to the formation of not only academic and applied magistracy, but also it another varieties. In turn, the course of reducing the period of study in higher education ensured the establishment of such a close relationship between programs of the first and second levels of training that the defense of the bachelor’s degree work perceive not as the end of the first stage of higher education, but rather as an intermediate test necessary for continuing in magistracy. It explains the low level of internal mobility during the transition from the first to the second level of higher education. Summing up the twenty-year experience of Germany on the transition to multi-level higher education, the author concludes that in the presence of a variety of types and forms of training, as well as degrees awarded, single-level training of specialists, adjusted to modern requirements, continues to operate in Germany.

About the Author

E. E. Sukhova
Smolensk State University
Russian Federation

Elena E. Sukhova, Cand. of Sci. (Sociology), associate professor

bld. 4, Przewalski Str., Smolensk, 214000



References

1. Bildung in Deutschland 2016. Ein indikatorengestützter Bericht mit einer Analyse zu Bildung und Migration (2016), W. Bertelsmann Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Bielefeld.

2. Frankenberg, P. (1999), „Das differenzierte deutsche Hochschulsystem aus Sicht der Universitäten“, Universitäten und Fachhochschulen im Wettbewerb und Kooperation. Beiträge zur Hochschulpolitik, Bonn, 1999. Iss. 9. S. 31–92.

3. Jahn, H. (2001), „Gestufte Studiengänge an deutschen Hochschulen“, in: Welbers, U. (Hrsg.) Studienreform mit Bachelor und Master. Gestufte Studiengänge des Lehrens und Lernens an Hochschulen. Lucherhand. 1. Aufl, S. 128–142.

4. Turner, G. (2001), Hochschule zwischen Vorstellung und Wirklichkeit. Berlin.

5. Schulze, W. (1999), „Profilbildung und Differenzierung. Die Hochschulen auf dem Weg ins 21. Jahrhundert“, in: Universitäten und Fachhochschulen im Wettbewerb und Kooperation. Beiträge zur Hochschulpolitik. iss. 9, S. 21–30, Bonn, Germany.


Review

For citations:


Sukhova E.E. Features of the formation of magistracy in Germany. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(3):75-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-75-85

Views: 97


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)