Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

The main approaches to the concept of “paraculture”

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-97-105

Abstract

The article analyzes the main interpretations of the concept of “paraculture” in modern research. The concept itself is closely related to the generic concept of “culture” and the main approaches to its interpretation. Exactly the axiological approach to culture contributes to the development and improvement of the man and society. In the framework of the postmodern paradigm, the concept of “culture” is significantly modified and expanded, including dehumanistic and non-rational foundations. The concept of “paraculture” along with the concepts of “quasiculture”, “pseudoculture”, “anticulture” in modern scientific and journalistic literature is used as a synonym for mass culture, in the context of the degradation,commercialization, and popularization of low values. In addition, along with that meaning, the concept of “paraculture” is used to denote occultism. The surge of interest in occultism is explained by postmodern disappointment in a rational, scientific picture of the world, in traditional religious dogmas and in searches for irrational ways of cognition. The permanent state of uncertainty and the existential challenges of our time also became important reasons for the global spread of paraculture. The article analyzes the process of expansion of the occult, esotericism, interest in paranormal phenomena in the world.

About the Author

G. V. Tartygasheva
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Galina V. Tartygasheva, Cand. of Sci. (Sociology)

bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993



References

1. Isaev, V.D. (2003), Chelovek v prostranstve tsivilizatsii i kul’tury [Man in the space of civilization and culture], Svitlitsya, Lugansk. Ivanov, A.V., Fotieva, I.V. and Shishin, M.Yu. “Culture and anti-culture” (2014) [Online], Report at the International Conference “Culture of Russia – Challenges and Solutions in the Modern World.” St. Petersburg, Gorky House of Scientists, RAS, November 27-28, 2014 2014 г. URL: https://culturaspb.ru/index.php/joomla/mir-cherez-kulturu-20015/poyasnitelnyj-material-2015/289-kultura-i-antikultura (Accessed 04 Sept. 2019).

2. Razlogov, K.E. (2019), A gift or a curse? Mosaic of mass culture [Online], available at: http://www.pseudology.org/information/DarProklyatie/index.htm (Accessed 09.09.2019).

3. Romanov, R.R. (2006), The phenomenon of provincial theater (Experimental sites of the Khabarovsk Territory), Ph.D. Thesis, Cultural Studies, Khabarovsk, Russia.

4. Tartigasheva, G.V. (2019), “Intelligentsia and the phenomenon of paraculture”, Kul’tura Rossii – vyzovy i puti resheniya v usloviyakh sovremennogo mira [The fate of the Russian intelligentsia: past, present, future] Proc. 20 th International. theoretical and methodologist. conferences, Russian State University for the Humanities, April 9, pp. 361–371, RSUH, Moscow, Russia.

5. Tartigasheva, G.V. (2018), “Sociological studies of religiosity on the Internet”, RSUH/ RGGU Bulletin. Series “Philosophy. Sociology. Art History”, no. 3, pp. 92–98.

6. Toshchenko, Zh.T. Kentavr-problema: opyt filosofskogo i sotsiologicheskogo analiza [The centaur problem. The experience of philosophical and sociological analysis], New Chronograph, Moscow, Russia.

7. Eliade, М. (2002), Okkul’tizm, koldovstvo i mody v kul’ture [Occultism, witchcraft, and fashion in culture], Helios, Sofia, Bulgarien.


Review

For citations:


Tartygasheva G.V. The main approaches to the concept of “paraculture”. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(3):97-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-97-105

Views: 584


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)