Functions of projective identification in cinema
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-131-143
Abstract
The article develops the concept of “projective identification” within the framework of identification theories as applied to the analysis of contemporary cinema. In the article, it is proved that cinema, in search of scenes, turns to fabulous and archetypal models that enhance the hero’s projection, identifying him or her with a role model. Such an identity becomes fatal for the hero himself. The striving of new Russian cinema, while maintaining a projective identity, to expand the range of identifications during dialogue with the viewer is also noted.
A critical analysis of theories of identity and an analysis of the specifics of screen art makes it possible to clearly distinguish between the identity and identification, and to distinguish various levels of identity due to the specifics of identification. An analysis of the motivations in the film and of the screen arts conventions made it possible to clarify at which point or defining moment in the film such identification begins. The author proves that it is associated not so much with the specifics of the plot as with the specifics of the visualization, due to the narrative substrate and the boundaries of its onscreen deployment.
Projective identification is considered as a resource of the spectator’s experience and as an innovation in cinema. It is proved that the modern existence of cinema in the space of new media and new arts turns what we consider art methods or devices into identification strategies that work differently depending on the expectations of the viewer and director’s optics, which becomes fundamentally changeable and unpredictable.
About the Author
V. A. KolotaevRussian Federation
Vladimir A. Kolotaev, Dr. of Sci. (Philology), professor
bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Basalaeva, I.P (2019), “Real people in the national cinema of the era of ‘good patriotism’”. New Literary Review, no. 3, pp. 149–168.
2. Bakhtin, M.M. (1979), “The text issue in linguistics, philology and other humanities.
3. The experience of philosophical analysis”, in: Bakhtin, M.M., Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity], pp. 281–307, Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia.
4. Danilenko, Yu.Yu., Fedorov, V.V. (2019), “Performative masks and the issue of identity in the video poetry of Janis Grants”. Culture and text, no. 2, pp. 97–105. Demina, L.D., Ralnikova, I.A. (2000), Psikhicheskoe zdorov’e i zashchitnye mekhanizmy lichnosti [Mental health and protective mechanisms of personality]. Publishing House of Altai State University, Altaysk, Russia.
5. Klein, M., Eisenck, S., Rivery, J., Hymann, P. (2001), Razvitie v psikhoanalize [Development in psychoanalysis]. Moscow, Russia.
6. Korobova, S.Yu. (2018), Socio-psychological factors of the dynamics of the experience of subjects under the influence of cult cinema, Ph.D. Thesis, Psychology, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia [Online], available at: https://dspace.susu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/0001.74/22601/2018_3301_korobovasu.pdf?sequence=1
7. Laplanche, J., Pontalis, J.-B. (1996), Slovar’ po psikhoanalizu [Dictionary of psychoanalysis]. Higher School, Moscow, Russia.
8. Lotman, Yu.M. (1992), “On two models of communication in the cultural system”, in: Lotman, Yu.M., Izbrannye stat’i [Selected articles], 3 vols, vol. 1, pp. 76–89, Alexandra, Tallinn [Estonian].
9. Mikhaylin, V.Yu. (2019), “Deconstruction of the thawing ‘sincerity’: ‘Save the drowning’ by Pavel Arsenov and the end of the Soviet mobilization project of the 1960s”, Neprikosnovennyi zapas, no. 3, pp. 196–205.
10. Mikhaylin, V.Yu. (2015), “The construction of a new Soviet identity in the ‘thaw’ movie”, in: Chelovek v usloviyakh modernizatsii XVIII – XX vv. [Man in the conditions of modernization of the 18th – 20th centuries], pp. 312–320, IIA URO RAN, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
11. Nemchenko, L.M. (2016), “Strategies for working with Soviet nostalgia in modern Russian cinema”, Filologicheskii klass, no. 1, pp. 108–112.
12. Nikolaev, V.G. (1998), “Identity”, in: Kul’turologiya: XX vek: Entsiklopediya [Culturology. XX century: Encyclopedia], 2 vols, vol. 1, pp. 238–239, University book; Aletheia, St. Petersburg, Russia.
13. Freud, S. (1989), Vvedenie v psikhoanaliz [Introduction to psychoanalysis: Lectures], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
14. Freud, S. (1991), «Ya» i «Ono»: Trudy raznykh let [“I” and “It.” Works of different years], book 1, Merani, Tbilisi [Georgia].
Review
For citations:
Kolotaev V.A. Functions of projective identification in cinema. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(3):131-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-3-131-143