Contingency of technology and strong program of Donald MacKenzie
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-8-248-261
Abstract
This article deal with the idea of contingency in technological development as it presented in works of Donald Angus MacKenzie. From his point of view, the main focus in sociological studies of technological development should be shifted from understanding it through the lenses of “natural trajectories” to grasp it as a result of social construction. In this sense, construction is understood not as the purposeful influence of society on technological progress, but as a complex interweaving of various interests and expectations, which, rather, forms the horizon of the desired development, than merely planning it. Also, MacKenzie supposes that economic approaches to the study of technology should become more open to the influence of sociological ideas. Such concepts as technological determinism or the natural trajectory of development limit the potential of both firms and scientific research. Given the complexity and uncertainty of technology, it is necessary to use new methods to study it. Thus, according to MacKenzie, the “ethnoaccountancy” can shed light on how firms correlate profits and R & D costs in different regions of the world, which means it can enrich both sociological and economic understanding of technology. Describing the approach of MacKenzie as a whole, one can conclude that it is based on extensive empirical material, while the author himself relies on openness to new approaches and issues, combining them into a specific bricolage, which is a model of interdisciplinary research.
About the Author
N. P. Zvolev
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nilolai P. Zvolev, postgraduate student
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, GSP-3, 125993
References
1. Bloor, D. (2002), “The Strong Programme in the Sociology of Knowledge”, Logos, Vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1-24.
2. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
3. Woolgar, S. (1991), “The turn to technology in social studies of science”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 20-50.
4. Law, J. (2010), “The materials of STS”, The Oxford handbook of material culture studies, Oxford, UK, pp. 173-188.
5. Bijker, W.E. et al. (2012), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
6. Edwards, P.N. (1997), “Knowing machines: Essays on technical change by Donald MacKenzie”, Technology and Culture, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 962-965.
7. MacKenzie, D.A. (1981), Statistics in Britain: 1865-1930; the social construction of scientific knowledge, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
8. MacKenzie, D.A. (1993), Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance, MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
9. MacKenzie, D.A. (1996), Knowing machines: Essays on technical change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
10. MacKenzie, D.A. (2004), Mechanizing proof: computing, risk, and trust, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
11. MacKenzie, D.A., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds.) (2007), Do Economist make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
12. MacKenzie, D.A. (2008), An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
13. MacKenzie, D.A. (2009), Material markets: How economic agents are constructed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Marx, K. (1955), “The Poverty of Philosophy”, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Soch. 2-e izd. V 30 t. T. 4 [Works, 2nd ed. In 30 vols., vol. 4], Gospolitizdat, Мoscow, USSR.
15. Marx, K. (1959), “A contribution to the critique of political economy”, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Soch. 2-e izd. V 30 t. T. 13. [Works, 2nd ed. In 30 vols., vol. 13], Gospolitizdat, Мoscow, USSR.
16. Marx, K. (1962), “Letter to Annenkov of December, 1846”, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Soch. 2-e izd. V 30 t. T. 27 [Works, 2nd ed. In 30 vols., vol. 27], Gospolitizdat, Мoscow, USSR.
17. Balibar, E. (transl.) (1970), “The basic concepts of historical materialism”, in Althusser, L., Balibar, E. and Brewster, B. (transl.), Reading capital, London : Nlb, vol. 19, pp. 199-308.
18. Marx, K. (1957), “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon”, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Soch. 2-e izd. V 30 t. T. 18 [Works, 2nd ed. In 30 vols., vol. 18], Gospolitizdat, Мoscow, USSR.
19. Landes, D.S. (1969), The unbound Prometheus: Technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
20. Samuel, R. (1977), “Workshop of the world: Steam power and hand technology in Mid-Victorian Britain”, History Workshop Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6-72.
21. Cockburn, C. (1981), “The Material of Male Power”, Feminist Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41-58.
22. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982), An evolutionary theory of economic change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Review
For citations:
Zvolev N.P. Contingency of technology and strong program of Donald MacKenzie. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2019;(3):248-261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2019-8-248-261
Views:
148
Email this article 