Regional socio-political cooperation. Actors and representatives (using the example of Kuzbass)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2020-3-76-86
Abstract
Socio-political cooperation determines the quality and content of relations between the state, society and people, including at the regional level. The purpose of the article is to assess the nature and content of socio-political cooperation, the possibilities of nominating representatives in the region. The article defines the subjects of that cooperation and their representatives in the socio-political space of the region. It is noted that the cooperation of subjects and representatives, unites all interested groups in the implementing decisions of local authorities in the region, creates conditions contributing to the realization of the population potential for its real participation in regional transformations in various fields. Based on the materials of a questionnaire survey conducted in the Kemerovo region, the authors identify issues that maintain the cooperation between the authorities and the population, the expression of interests and participation in it, the opportunities for nominating representatives. In conclusion, the authors infer that there are different degrees of expression of interests in socio-political cooperation among social groups (men and women, youth), the willingness to delegate the solution of their issues to representatives. Those representatives act as a real driving force in expressing the intentions and interests of the authorities and the population, they contribute to the effective participation of various social groups in the transformation of the region.
About the Authors
Е. A. Kranzeeva
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Kranzeeva, Cand. of Sci. (Sociology), associate professor
bld. 6, Krasnaya Street, Kemerovo, 650000
A. L. Burmakina
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna L. Burmakina
bld. 6, Krasnaya Street, Kemerovo, 650000
О. A. Altemerova
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olesya A. Altemerova
bld. 6, Krasnaya Street, Kemerovo, 650000
References
1. Altemerova, O.A. (2015), “The distancing of the subjects in the political space”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, no 1 (29), pp. 129–136.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1993), Sotsiologiya politiki [Sociology of politics], Transl. from French, ed., comp. and foreword by N.A. Shmatko, Socio-Logos, Moscow, Russia.
3. Kitaitseva, O.V. (2016), “Practices of information consumption and public trust of Russians”, Toshchenko, Zh.T. (ed.), Sotsiologiya zhizni: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i sotsial’nye praktiki [Sociology of Life. Theoretical Foundations and Social Practices], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 374–381.
4. Kranzeeva, E.A., Tokmasheva, Yu.V. and Shpak, L.L. (2016), “From the experience of regional research on the issues of the life support for urban population”, Shpak L.L. (ed.), Sotsial’naya i politicheskaya mobilizatsiya: mikrosotsiologicheskii analiz [Social and political mobilization. Microsociological analysis], 2nd ed. revised and enlarged, Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia, pp. 272–286.
5. Lapin, N.I. (1997), “Values, interest groups and the transformation of Russian society”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no 3, pp. 19–24.
6. Lapin, N.I. (2010), “New research challenges of regional communities”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no 7, pp. 28–38.
7. Levin, S., Sablin, K. and Rutskii, V. (2018), “The Practices of Cooperation between Entrepreneurs and Authorities in Russia’s Resource Extracting Regions: The ‘Scenes of Power’ Analytical Approach”, Mir Rossii, vol. 27, no 3, pp. 6–27.
8. Novokreshchenov, A.V. (2019), “Local community as a self-organizing system”, Razvitie territorii, no 2 (16), pp. 6–10.
9. Olson, M. (1995), Logika kollektivnykh deistvii: Obshchestvennye blaga i teoriya grupp [The logic of collective action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups], Trans. frjm Engl., Fond Ekonomicheskoi Initsiativy, Moscow, Russia.
10. Petrova, L.A. and Sungurov, A.Yu. (2012), “Intermediary institutions between authorities and society. The case of St. Petersburg”, Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya, no 2, pp. 78–96.
11. Shtompka, P. (2001), “Social change as trauma”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], no 1, pp. 6–16.
12. Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2004), “The Sociology of Power. The Genesis of Ideas”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no 7 (243), pp. 12–22.
13. Toshchenko, Zh.T. (2020), Obshchestvo travmy: mezhdu evolyutsiei i revolyutsiei (opyt teoreticheskogo i empiricheskogo analiza) [Trauma society: between evolution and revolution (essay of theoretical and empirical analysis)], Ves’ mir, Moscow, Russia.
14. Urban, O.A. and Demchuk, N.V. (2018), “Expert Assessment of Agglomerative Communications in the Solution for Modernization Issues in Southern Kuzbass Monotowns”, Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences, no. 1, pp. 51–57.
15. Velikaya, N.M. (2020), “Russian youth in the field of modern politics. Between traditionalism and opposition”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 2, pp. 57–67.
16. Zheltov, V.V. and Shpak, L.L. (1997), Sotsial’no-politicheskoe vzaimodeistvie: proshloe i sovremennost’ [Socio-political cooperation. Past and present], Kemerovo, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Kranzeeva Е.A., Burmakina A.L., Altemerova О.A. Regional socio-political cooperation. Actors and representatives (using the example of Kuzbass). RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2020;(3):76-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2020-3-76-86
Views:
131
Email this article 