Typological characteristics of ceremonial and chamber image in the Russian portrait painting of 18th century
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2020-4-112-127
Abstract
The article is devoted to the thorough research of distinctive features of ceremonial and chamber types of portrait in Russian art of 18th century. The matter drew attention of scientists earlier but the identification of specific characteristics, inherent to each type of portrait painting, is not available in academic literature on the subject at the moment. The need for defining a set of features appears relevant for studies into the portrait painting at the turn of 18th – 19th centuries, which is characterized by combination of particularities peculiar to different variants of image in one artwork. It is the identification of distinctive typological characteristics of ceremonial and chamber portrait that allows to explore certain artworks of the mentioned period more effectivly in comparison with stylistic analysis the use of which is objectively difficult with coexistence of various artistic directions.
About the Author
I. A. AbramkinRussian Federation
Ivan A. Abramkin, Cand. of Sci. (Art Studies)
bld. 6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Abramkin, I.A. (2016), “Portraits by V. Borovikovsky in the first half of the 1800’s. On the issue of “the portrait and style” at the turn of the 18th – 19th centuries”, Articul’t, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 46–54.
2. Alekseeva, T.V. (1975), Vladimir Lukich Borovikovskij i russkaya kul’tura na rubezhe XVIII–XIX vekov [Vladimir Lukich Borovikovsky and the Russian culture at the turn of 18th – 19th centuries], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia.
3. Chezhina, Y.I. (2006), Costume portrait in Russian art of 18th Century as a reflection of age’s spirit, Ph.D. Thesis, History of Art, Saint Petersburg State University, SaintPetersburg, Russia.
4. Daniel, S.M. (1990), Iskusstvo videt’. O tvorcheskih sposobnostyah vospriyatiya, o yazyke linij i krasok i o vospitanii zritelya [Art of vision. About creative ability of perception, language of lines and paints and on the spectator education of spectator], Iskusstvo, Leningrad, Russia.
5. Evangulova, O.S. (1987), Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo v Rossii pervoj chetverti XVIII veka. Problemy stanovleniya hudozhestvennyh principov Novogo vremeni [Visual arts in Russia of first quarter of 18th century. Issues of the New Time artistic principles], Izdatel’stvo MGU, Moscow, Russia.
6. Evangulova, O.S. (2007), Russkoe hudozhestvennoe soznanie XVIII veka i iskusstvo zapadnoevropejskih shkol [Russian artistic mentality of 18th century and art of West-European schools], Pamyatniki istoricheskoj mysli, Moscow, Russia.
7. Ivanickii, A.I. (2000), “Intimate portrait of rococo. On the question of ontological necessity of ‘Big style’ ”, in Evsina, N.A. (ed.), XVIII vek: Assambleya iskusstv. Vzaimodejstvie iskusstv v russkoj kul’ture XVIII veka [18th century: Assembly of arts. Cooperation of arts in Russian culture of 18th century], Pinakoteka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 132–142.
8. Kantor, A.M. (1977), “Art of 18th century. Part 1”, in Malaya istoriya iskusstv. Iskusstvo XVIII veka [Small history of art. Art of 18th Century], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia, pp. 6–26.
9. Karev, A.A. (2003), Klassicizm v russkoj zhivopisi [Classicism in Russian painting], Belyj gorod, Moscow, Russia.
10. Karev, A.A. (2005), “The Pretence of a courtier and the gesture issue in the portrait of the age of Catherine the Great”, in Ryazantsev, I.V. (ed.), Russkoe iskusstvo Novogo vremeni. Issledovaniya i materialy [Russian art of New age. Research and materials], Pamyatniki istoricheskoj mysli, Moscow, Russia, pp. 118–135.
11. Kovalenskaya, N.N. (1964), Russkii klassicizm. Zhivopis’. Skul’ptura. Grafika [Russian classicism. Painting. Sculpture. Graphics], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia.
12. Lebedev, A.V. (1994), “Russian portrait of second half of 18th century and the issue of style”, in Pospelov, G.G. (ed.), Russkii klassicizm vtoroj poloviny XVIII – nachala XIX veka [Russian classicism of second half of 18th century – beginning of 19th century], Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia, pp. 85–92.
13. Lotman, Y.M. (1992), “The poetics of everyday behavior in Russian culture of 18th century”, in Lotman, Y.I., Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 tomah. Tom 1. Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury [Selected articles in 3 volumes, vol. 1. Articles about the semiotics and typology of culture], Aleksandra, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 248–268.
14. Lotman, Y.M. (1992b), “Stage and painting as encoding devices of man’s cultural behavior in the beginning of 19th century”, in Lotman, Y.I., Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 tomah. Tom 1. Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury [Selected articles in 3 volumes, vol. 1. Articles about the semiotics and typology of culture], Aleksandra, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 287–295.
15. Lotman, Y.M. (2002), “Portrait”, in Lotman, Y.I., Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles about the semiotics of the culture and art], Akademicheskij proekt, SaintPetersburg, Russia, pp. 349–375.
16. Lotman, Y.M. (2002), “A problem of sign and symbolic system and a typology of Russian culture in 9th –19th centuries”, in Lotman, Y.I., Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles about the semiotics of culture and art], Akademicheskij proekt, SaintPetersburg, Russia, pp. 154–179.
17. Sarab’yanov, D.V. (1980), Russkaya zhivopis’ XIX veka sredi evropejskih shkol [Russian painting of 19th century among European national schools], Sovetskii hudozhnik, Moscow, Russia.
18. Svirida, I.I. (2000), “Theatrics as a synthesizing form of culture in 18th century”, in Evsina, N.A. (ed.), XVIII vek: Assambleya iskusstv. Vzaimodejstvie iskusstv v russkoj kul’ture XVIII veka [18th century: Assembly of arts. Cooperation of arts in Russian culture of 18th century], Pinakoteka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 5–18.
19. Turchin, V.S. (1969), Russian portrait of Romantic Age, Ph.D. Thesis, History of Art, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
20. Turchin, V.S. (1981), Epoha romantizma v Rossii: K istorii russkogo iskusstva pervoj treti XIX veka [Romantic Age in Russia. On history of Russian art in the first third of 19th century], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia.
21. Turchin, V.S. (1989), Main issues of West-European and Russian art in the end of 18th – beginning 19th century, Abstract of D. Sc. dissertation, History of Art, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
22. Turchin, V.S. (2001), Aleksandr I i neoklassicizm v Rossii [Alexander I and the neoclassicism in Russia], Zhiraf, Moscow, Russia.
23. Vdovin, G.V. (2005), Persona. Individual’nost’. Lichnost’. Opyt samopoznaniya v iskusstve russkogo portreta XVIII veka [Person. Individuality. Personality. Experience of selfcognition in art of Russian portrait in 18th century], Progress-Tradiciya, Moscow, Russia.
24. Yablonskaya, T.V. (1978), Classification of the portrait genre in Russia in the 18th century, Ph.D. Thesis, History of Art, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
25. Zernov, B.A. (1977), “Art of 18th century. Part 1”, in Malaya istoriya iskusstv. Iskusstvo XVIII veka [Small history of art. Art of 18th century], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia, pp. 27–64.
Review
For citations:
Abramkin I.A. Typological characteristics of ceremonial and chamber image in the Russian portrait painting of 18th century. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2020;(4):112-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2020-4-112-127