Gender specificity of religious behavior (on the example of the Dagestan population)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-1-457-467
Abstract
The issue of religiosity and resulting from it religious behavior manifested itself vividly in the post-Soviet period against the background of secularization of Russian society. There is no doubt that religion in society as a whole and in the personal life of an individual plays an essential role, which may be ambiguous in different historical periods. Therefore, the vector of development for religious revival will determine the positive/negative scenario and the climate in society. The marker for diagnosing the religious behavior of the Dagestan population is the content of the concept “true believer”, which defines normative religious practice. Verification of the empirical material shows the existence of certain differences in the attitudes of the interviewed men and women in the designation “a true believer”: the latter focus on the moral and moral attribute, the presence of certain moral properties that allow identifying a person as a “true believer”.
About the Author
M. M. Shakhbanova
Dagestan Federal Research Russian Academy of Sciences Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Madina M. Shakhbanova, Dr. of Sci. (Sociology)
bld. 75, Yaragskogo Street, Makhachkala, 367030
References
1. Alekseev, N.P. (1967) “Methods and results of studying the religiosity of the rural population (based on the materials of the Orel region)”, Questions of scientific atheism, iss. 3, Mysl’, Moscow, Russia, pp. 131–150.
2. Anurin, V.F. (2013), “Religion as a factor of social integration”, Sociological Studies, no. 1, pp. 135–146.
3. Chesnokova, V.F. (2005), “Tesnym putem: protsess votserkovleniya naseleniya Rossii v kontse XX veka [In a tight path. Process of church orientation of people of Russia in the end of 20th century]”, Akademicheskii proekt, Moscow, Russia.
4. Divisenko, K.S. (2011), “Religious knowledge, beliefs, practices in structure of life world”, Sociological Journal, no. 4, pp. 84–100.
5. Il’yasov, F.N. (1987), “Religious consciousness and behavior”, Sociological Studies, no 3, pp. 50–55.
6. Isaeva, V.B. (2019), “Theory of deprivation as instrument of research of nontraditional religiousity”, Sociological Studies, no. 9, pp. 31–50. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006656-4.
7. Krasnikov, A.N. (ed.) (1998), Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya [Mistics. Religion. Science. Classics of world religion science. Anthology], Kanon+, Moscow, Russia.
8. Prutskova, E.V. (2013), “Religiosity and its consequences in the sphere of norms and values”, Sociological Journal, no. 2, pp. 72–88.
9. Ryzhova, S.V. (2013), Religiosity, Ethno-Confessional Identity and Issues of Interethnic Accord”, Sociological Studies, no. 2, pp. 49–58, DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004006-9.
10. Sinelina, Yu.Yu. (2013), “About the dynamics of the religiosity of Russians and some methodological issues of its study (religious consciousness and behavior of Orthodox and Muslims)”, Sociological Studies, no. 10, pp. 104–115.
11. Ugrinovich, D.M. (1985), Vvedenie v religiovedenie [Introduction to religion studies], Mysl’, Moscow, Russia.
12. Yablokov, I.N. (1979), Sociologiya religii [Sociology of religion], Mysl’, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Shakhbanova M.M. Gender specificity of religious behavior (on the example of the Dagestan population). RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2022;(1):457-467. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-1-457-467
Views:
126
Email this article 