The Heroes and Nonentities, or Television versus sculpture. Yerbossyn Meldibekov’s visual anthropology
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-125-145
Abstract
In 2001 Meldibekov created the work called Pastan – a video-performance in which the author is being methodically beaten and insulted in the process. Pastan is the first in the series that show four different scenarios involving a humiliated and suffering subject. That character represents regression to some kind of a primary state, assimilation with other living creatures and even inanimate objects. This anthropological and psychological ascesis is in line with the formal treatment of the video-performances, going back to the neo-avant-garde of the 1960s and 1970s. The main medium here is also the body of the artist, almost free of any trappings of sociocultural identity. However, unlike the “classics”, Meldibekov is interested not so much in the boundaries of art as in the boundaries of humanity. In general, his works form a visual anthropology based on two poles. On the one hand, one can see monumental and triumphant forms in which political power is expressing itself, using esthetic mechanisms to rise vainly above the perishable human nature. But ironically, it is these monuments that Meldibekov sees as a symbol of the ephemeral. On the opposite pole one can see something over which power rises, but which inevitably forms its substrate, its perishable flesh, the expendable of history. The character in those video-performances is an antipode to the hero of a monument: he is miserable and unmonumental. But he is much sturdier; he persistently faces the strikes of destiny and is not so easy to break.
About the Author
A. N. FomenkoRussian Federation
Andrei N. Fomenko, Dr. of Sci. (Art Studies)
bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047
References
1. Baudrillard, J. (2000), V teni molchalivogo bol’shinstva, ili Konets sotsial’nogo sveta [In the Shadow of the Silent Majority, or The End of Social], Suslov, N. (transl.), Izd-vo Ural’skogo universiteta, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
2. Buchloh, B. (1990), “Conceptual Art 1962–1969: From the Aesthetic of Administration to the Critique of Institutions”, October, no. 55, pp. 105–143.
3. Crow, T. (1996), “The Simple Life: Pastoralism and the Persistence of Genre in Recent Art”, Modern Art in the Common Сulture, Yale University Press, London, UK, pp. 173–211.
4. Dyogot’, E. (1998), Terroristicheskii naturalism [Terrorist Naturalism], Ad Marginem, Moscow, Russia.
5. Empson, W. (1974), Some Versions of Pastoral, New Directions, New York, USA.
6. Fomenko, A. (2007), “Lumpen Art”, Arkhaisty, oni zhe novatory [Archaists, or innovators], NLO, Moscow, Russia, pp. 51–58.
7. Fomenko, A. (2020), “Amusing Modernism”, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, no. 114, pp. 110–123.
8. Fomenko A. (2021), “Beyond the Threshold of the Visible. The Photographic Objects of Alexander Ugay”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 263–287.
9. Foster, H., Krauss, R., Bois, Y.-A., Buchloh, B. and Joselit, D. (2019), Iskusstvo s 1900 goda: modernizm, antimodernizm, postmodernizm [Art since 1900: modernizm, antimodernizm, postmodernizm], Fomenko, A. and. Shestakov, A. (transl., eds), Ad Marginem, Moscow, Russia.
10. Girard, R. (2012), “Dostoevsky. From Doppelgänger to Oneness”, Kritika iz podpol’ya [Critique from the Underground], Movnina, N. (transl.), NLO, Moscow, Russia, pp. 42–133.
11. Girard, R. (2016), Veshchi, sokrytye ot sozdaniya mira [Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World], Luk’yanov, A. and Khmelevskaya, O. (transl.), Izd-vo Bibleiskobogoslovskogo in-ta, Moscow, Russia.
12. Groys, B. (2003), Kommentarii k iskusstvu, [Art Comments], Transl from German. by A. Fomenko, A. et. al. (transl.), Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, Moscow, Russia.
13. Krauss, R. (1977), The Double Negative: a New Syntax for Sculpture, Passages in Modern Sculpture, The Viking Press, New York, USA, pp. 243–288.
14. Kruger, A. (2015), “Elena and Viktor Vorobyev: On Precision and Imperfection”, Misiano V. (ed.), Elena and Viktor Vorobyev: Khudozhnik spit [The artist sleeps. Catalogue of exhibition in the Kastaev Art Museum], Aspan Gallery, Almaty, Kazakhstan, pp. 28–33.
15. Misiano, V. and Kozhakhmetov, D. (eds.) (2016), Yerbossyn Meldibekov: Eternal Return, Aspan Gallery, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
16. Shatalova, O. (2009), Cross and Crescent of Shymkent [Chimkentskiy krest I polumes’az], URL: http://www.arba.ru/article/5617 (Accessed 9 September 2022).
17. Smithson, R. (1996), “A Tour of the Monuments of Passaic, New Jersey”, The Collected Writings, University of Chicago Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, pp. 68–74.
18. Sorokina, Yu. (2017), “Nomadic Modernism as a Local Innovation”, Vorob’eva, D. (ed.), Sovremennoe iskusstvo Vostoka, Sb. materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchn. konf. [Contemporary Art of the East. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference], Mosk. muzei sovremennogo iskusstva, Gos. in-t iskusstvoznaniya, Moscow, Russia, pp. 269–281.
19. Sorokina, Yu. and Shklyayeva, S. (2015), “The Eurasian Utopia. The Legacy of the Nomadic Modernist”, Third Text, no. 29 (6), pp. 511–525.
20. Tao Te Ching (1984), “The book of “dao and de”, Alikhanov, Yu., Nikitin, V. and Pomerantsev, L. (eds.), Literatura drevnego Vostoka [Literature of the ancient East. Iran, India, China], Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 227–230.
21. Ul’ko, A. (2015), “Child on the Sand”, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, no. 96, available at: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/18/article/269 (Accessed 9 September 2022).
Review
For citations:
Fomenko A.N. The Heroes and Nonentities, or Television versus sculpture. Yerbossyn Meldibekov’s visual anthropology. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2022;(3):125-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-125-145