Names of collectives in the USSR. Collective personalities in the self-perception of soviet society (the view of A.F. Losev’s “philosophy of the name”)
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2024-2-46-63
Abstract
The article deals with an issue of the labor collectives’ names in Soviet society. The fact that collectives have names indicates that the people of that society regarded them as personalities, because only a person can have a name.
The ideas of the philosophy of myth and the philosophy of the name created by AF Losev are used as a theoretical and methodological basis. According to AF Losev, socialism is a society where material production is absolutized. Under socialism, a person is understood only as part of a labor collective, which is a collective personality and it is precisely the entity which gives the status of the personality to an individual. Through the name of the collective, the latter is integrated into social reality, communicates with other collectives and the state. The article classifies the names of collectives, suggests that such a phenomenon represented the secularization of the tradition of naming churches in Russian Orthodoxy.
About the Authors
R. R. VakhitovRussian Federation
Rustem R. Vakhitov - Cand. of Sci. (Philosophy), Ufa UST, Ufa SPTU.
Bld. 32, Zaki Validi Street, Ufa, 450072; bld. 1, Kosmonavtov Street, Ufa, 450064
A. E. Rodionova
Russian Federation
Anna E. Rodionova - Cand. of Sci. (Philology).
Bld. 3a, Oktyabrskoi revolyutsii Street, Ufa, 450000
References
1. Fedorenko, A.A. (2005), The issue of the relationship between language and people in the works of A.A. Potebnya and N.S. Trubetskoy (historical and philosophical analysis), Abstract of the PhD dissertation, Moscow, Russia.
2. Kuchinsky, A.V. (1997), Prestupniki i prestupleniya. Zakony prestupnogo mira. Pobegi, tyuremnye igry [Criminals and crimes. Laws of the underworld. Escapes, prison games], available at: https://info.wikireading.ru/15103 (Accessed 25 March 2024).
3. Kudyukin, P. (2012), “Industrial quasi-community as the center of the life world”, Glushchenko, I.V., Kagarlitsky, B.Yu. and Kurenny, V.A. (eds.) SSSR: zhizn’ posle smerti [USSR. Life after death], Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, Moscow, Russia, pp. 44–54.
4. Obolevich, T. (2014), Ot imyaslaviya k estetike. Kontseptsiya simvola Alekseya Loseva. Istoriko-filosofskoe issledovanie [From name worship to aesthetics. The concept of the symbol by Alexey Losev. Historical and philosophical research], BBI, Moscow, Russia.
5. Reznichenko, A.I. (2012), O smyslakh imen: Bulgakov, Losev, Florenskii, Frank et dii minores. [On the Meanings of Names: Bulgakov, Losev, Florensky, Frank et dii minores], REGNUM, Moscow, Russia.
6. Rice, T.T. (2006), Vizantiya: byt, religiya, kul’tura [Everyday Life in Byzantium. Religion, Culture], Tsentrpoligraf, Moscow, Russia.
7. Tsepeleva, N.V. (2015), “Ontognoseological aspects of the doctrine of personality by A.F. Losev”, Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, no. 9 (59), part II, pp. 194–197.
Review
For citations:
Vakhitov R.R., Rodionova A.E. Names of collectives in the USSR. Collective personalities in the self-perception of soviet society (the view of A.F. Losev’s “philosophy of the name”). RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2024;(2):46-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2024-2-46-63