Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

The artistic intelligentsia as a subject of the social contract during the cultural revolution in the USSR (1930s)

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2024-3-24-34

Abstract

The article considers features of the social contract between the artistic intelligentsia and the Soviet political elite during the cultural revolution in the USSR. In that period the social contract was still paternalistic in nature, but being based not only on violence, but also on consent, on the general idea of implementing the social and cultural revolution and on benefits of various kinds that the creators could get from the new government. Since the late 20s, the management by the sphere of culture and art began to be centralized and the state became the main subject of cultural policy. Strict ideological control over the cultural process was carried out as well as the persecution of aesthetic dissent.

At the same time, loyal cultural figures are rewarded through government orders and by being given high social status, high salaries, granting rights to publications, personal exhibitions and business trips abroad, awards and prizes, solutions for household and family concerns, etc. The principle of “socialist realism” was declared as the dominant creative principle. The Soviet party and state leadership enjoyed exceptional opportunities to influence the formation and change of the public consciousness of the Soviet people through cultural production.

About the Author

G. V. Tartygasheva
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Galina V. Tartygasheva, Cand. of Sci. (Sociology)

bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047



References

1. Antipina, V.A. (2005), Povsednevnaya zhizn’ sovetskikh pisatelei 30-e – 50-e gody [The daily life of Soviet writers in the 30s–50s], Molodaya gvardiya, Moscow, Russia.

2. Auzan, А.А. (2014), Ekonomika vsego. Kak instituty menyayut nashu zhizn’ [Economics of everything. How institutions change our lives], Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, Russia.

3. Gasparov, M.L. (2000), “Intellectuals, intelligent people, intellectuality”, Russkaya intelligentsiya. Istoriya i sud’ba [Russian intelligentsia. History and fate], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, pp. 5–13.

4. Kampfner, J. (2012), Svoboda na prodazhu: kak my razbogateli – i lishilis’ nezavisimosti. [Freedom for sale: How we made money and lost our liberty], Corpus, Moscow, Russia.

5. Kuchenkova, A.V. (2023), “Popular sovereignty and the right to revolt in the conception of the social contract by J.J. Rousseau”, RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 4, pp. 79–88.

6. Tartygasheva, G.V. (2023), “The idea of a social contract in the writings of Thomas Hobbes”, RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 4, pp. 89–99.

7. Toshchenko, J.T. (2023), “The social contract: the evolution of ideas”, Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya [Russia is reforming], no. 21, pp. 98–121.

8. Turchin, P.V. (2024), [End Times ], Zhelninov, V. (transl.), AST, Moscow, Russia.

9. Yavlinskii, G.A. (2006), Perspektivy Rossii. Ekonomicheskii i politicheskii vzglyad [Prospects of Russia. An economic and political view], GALLEYa-PRINT, Moscow, Russia, available at: http://www.yavlinsky.ru/news/index.phtml?id=2790 (Accessed 7 February 2024).


Review

For citations:


Tartygasheva G.V. The artistic intelligentsia as a subject of the social contract during the cultural revolution in the USSR (1930s). RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2024;(3):24-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2024-3-24-34

Views: 63


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)