The Soviet Union in the narratives of political parties in modern Russia. Reasons and social foundations
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2024-3-134-144
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to determine the reasons and social foundations for using the image of the Soviet Union in the narratives of political parties in modern Russia. The publications of the four largest and oldest parties were taken as the object of analysis. Based on the results of the study, it was found that despite the positioning of party ideologies as irreconcilable and conflicting, nothing of thr kind is in reality. There are different versions of the same narrative, the main elements of which are as follows: the Soviet Union is a continuation of the thousand-year tradition of Russian statehood; October 1917 is an important event in Russian history, but it is not given the status of “beginning of times”; there is an overt or covert conciliatory position; rejection of revolutionary social changes in favor of reformist solutions to societal issues; focusing on the subjective factors of the emergence and disappearance of the USSR. The reason for the convergence of narratives between the ruling and opposition political parties is seen in the similarity of the social positions of their leaders (representatives).
About the Author
M. S. KozyrevRussian Federation
Maksim S. Kozyrev, Cand. of Sci. (Philosophy), associate professor
bld. 8, Zoya and Alexander Kosmodemyanskikh Street, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Bakhlova, O.V. and Bakhlov, I.V. (2023), “The theme of historical memory in the discourse and practice of Russian parliamentary parties: federal and regional levels”, Russian Journal of Regional Studies, vol. 31, no. 2 (123), pp. 238–254.
2. Bourdieu, P. (2007), Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva [Sociology of social space], In-t eksperimental’noi sotsiologii, Aleteiya, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
3. Malinova, O.Yu. (2017), “Uncomfortable centenary. Results of reconsidering ‘the founding myth’ of the USSR in the Russian official historical narrative”, Political Science, no. 3, pp. 13–39.
4. Manheim, K. (1992), Ideologiya i utopiya [Ideology and utopia], INION, Moscow, Russia.
5. Meleshkina, E.Yu. and Tolpygina, O.A. (2023), “Using images of the Soviet past in the rhetoric of ‘Just Russia’ and the Liberal Democratic Party”, Political Science, no. 1, pp. 92–112.
6. Meletinskii, E.M. (1998), “Myth and the twentieth century], Izbrannye stat’i. Vospominaniya [Selected Articles. Memories], RGGU, Moscow, Russia, pp. 419–428.
7. Moshkin, S.V. (2021), “The 1917 October revolution memory politics”, Scientific Journal “Discource-P”, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 64–75.
8. Neklyudov, S.Yu. (2000), “The structure and function of myth”, Ajmermaher, K. Bomsdorf, F. and Bordjukov, G. (eds.), Mify i mifologiya v sovremennoi Rossii [Myths and mythology in modern Russia. Collected works], AIRO-XX, Moscow, Russia, pp. 17–38.
9. Paderina, S.F. (2017), “The October Revolution in the symbolic politicy of the 21st century Russian elite”, Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science, no. 6, pp. 70–84.
Review
For citations:
Kozyrev M.S. The Soviet Union in the narratives of political parties in modern Russia. Reasons and social foundations. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2024;(3):134-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2024-3-134-144