Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

The concept of the “Death of the author” by R. Barth and authorship in interaction with Artificial Intelligence

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-1-86-100

Abstract

This article considers how Roland Barthes’ concept of “Death of the Author” interacts with contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, focusing on how those technologies transform Barthes’s proposed notions of authorship. Barthes’ semiotic conception asserts that the interpretation of a text is not limited by the author’s intentions or biographical context. With the rise of AI in content creation, it is proposed to consider that technological mechanism in relation to the concepts proposed by Barthes, namely to demonstrate the applicability of the notion of “author” as “scriptor” and to reflect the form of AI influence in positive and critical literature. As well as reveal the applicability of the concept to visual forms of creative work and give examples of interaction between the “author-scripter” and AI. The interplay between Barth’s theory and the introduction of AI into the work process calls for a reassessment of authorship and textual meaning in relation to traditional literary theories, as well as legal frameworks governing copyright in contemporary society. The article argues that AI, acting as a new “discursive agent”, blurs the boundaries between creator and creation, leading to a heightened state of uncertainty, heterogeneity, and elusiveness.

About the Authors

A. V. Prygunova
MGIMO-University of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Ariana V. Prygunova, applicant

bld. 76, Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119454



N. V. Litvak
MGIMO-University of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Nikolai V. Litvak, Dr. of Sci. (Sociology), professor

bld. 76, Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Lazebnikova, I.V. (2009), “Conceptual Albums of the 1970s. Ilya Kabakov and Viktor Pivovarov”, Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, Philology, Art Studies, no. 22 (160), pp. 169–176.

2. Lievrouw, L.A. (2006), “New media design and development: Diffusion of innovations v. social shaping of technology”, The Handbook of New Media, Sage Publishing, California, USA, pp. 246–265.

3. Manovich, L. (2019), AI aesthetics, Strelka Press, Moscow, Russia.

4. Manovich, L. (2024), “Make it new: GenAI, modernism, and database art”, available at: https://manovich.net/index.php/projects/make-it-new-genai-modernism-anddatabase-art (Accessed 27 August 2024).

5. Ozhigova, M.M. (2022), “The Category of ‘Author’ in the studies of Michel Foucault”, Philological Class, no. 27 (4), pp. 88–98.

6. Petrov, A.P. and Pronchev, G.B. (2022), “Dynamical model of conversation of users of online news media”, Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling, no. 54–55, pp. 104–128.

7. Rower, A. (2009), “Calder. Sculpturor of Air”, Tretyakov Gallery Magazine, no. 4 (25), available at: https://www.tg-m.ru/articles/4-2009-25/vozdushnye-skulptury (Accessed 25 August 2024).

8. Stiegler, B. and Crogan, P. (2010), “Knowledge, care and trans-individuation: An interview with Bernard Stiegler”, Cultural Politics an international journal, no. 6 (2), pp. 157–170.

9. Sun, P. (2024), “A study of artificial intelligence in the production of film”, SHS Web of Conferences, no. 3, available at: https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2024/03/shsconf_icpahd2024_03004.pdf (Accessed 27 August 2024).

10. Willoughby, K.W. (2004), “Technological semantics and technological practice: Lessons from an enigmatic episode in twentieth-century technology studies”, Knowledge, Technology & Policy, no. 17 (3), pp. 11–43.

11. Wilson, M. (2015), “How should we speak about art and technology?”, Crossings: Journal of Art and Technology, vol. 1, available at: http://crossings.tcd.ie/issues/1.1/Wilson/ (Accessed 27 August 2024).

12. Yang, G. (2009), “The internet as a cultural form: Technology and the human condition in China”, Knowledge, Technology & Policy, no. 22 (2), pp. 109–115.


Review

For citations:


Prygunova A.V., Litvak N.V. The concept of the “Death of the author” by R. Barth and authorship in interaction with Artificial Intelligence. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2025;(1):86-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-1-86-100

Views: 31


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)