Preview

RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies

Advanced search

Picturing the urban residents. On the issue of forming the local dweller’s image

https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-2-119-131

Abstract

The article focuses on the issue of forming the local dweller’s image in tourist practices. It is proved that the promotion of a tourist destination is connected not only with commercial benefits, but also always concerns the local population, its interaction with tourists and visitors. Nevertheless, the development of tourism has led to a certain separation of travelers and locals. As a result, they are at risk of developing social stereotypes and bias against each other. The interview materials reveal the main features of tourist ideas about the residents of the Kaliningrad region. External assessments of Kaliningrad residents reveal an imbalance between impressions of them as residents of the frontier territory and as residents of the resort city. It is also noted that the labor, military, and cultural qualities of the local population are poorly reflected in external views. The article identifies main channels and ways for shaping the image of local dwellers: the creation of specialized tourist materials, modern thematic museums and expositions, the incorporation of stories about the local population into urban infrastructure and service facilities, and their representation in sightseeing discourse. Despite the fact that the article analyzes the Kaliningrad case, which has its own specifics, the proposed ways of constructing a positive image of the local population seem relevant for other regions.

About the Author

T. V. Beletskaya
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

Tatiana V. Beletskaya

bld. 14, Aleksandra Nevskogo Street, Kaliningrad, Russia, 236016



References

1. Anholt, S. (2008), “Place branding: Is it marketing, or isn’t it?”, Place branding and public diplomacy, no. 1 (4), pp. 1–6.

2. Cherepanova, N.V. (2006), “Travel as a way of measuring cultural space”, Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, no. 7, pp. 65–71.

3. Lindner, R. (2017), “Texture, imaginary, habitus. Key concepts of cultural analysis in urban studies”, in Sobstvennaya logika gorodov: novye podkhody v urbanistike [Own Logic of Cities. New Approaches in Urbanism], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, pp. 68–77.

4. Penkina, N.V. and Chernyavskaya, O.V. (2021), “Tourism as a social experience system: social and phisophical analysis”, MCU Journal of Philosophical Sciences, no. 4 (40), pp. 37–47.

5. Rezvukhina, A.I. (2020), “Invention of the past: landscape as a way of identity constructing”, Studia Culturae, no. 46 (4), pp. 186–202.

6. Shevchenko, I.O. and Beletskaya, T.V. (2024), “Symbolic capital of a place as a constellation of social meanings (the case of the Kaliningrad region)”, Sociological Studies, no. 10, pp. 116–128.

7. Sologubov, A.M. (2012), “Migrant as homo scientis: the epistemological aspect of reclamation of the Kaliningrad region”, Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social sciences, no. 6, pp. 39–46.

8. Wirth, L. (2005), Izbrannye raboty po sotsiologii: Cbornik perevodov [Selected works on sociology], A collection of translations, INION RAN, Moscow, Russia.


Review

For citations:


Beletskaya T.V. Picturing the urban residents. On the issue of forming the local dweller’s image. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2025;(2):119-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-2-119-131

Views: 33


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-6401 (Print)
ISSN 2073-6401 (Online)