An objectivity of the ideal in a modern philosophy

Abstract

The article analyzes the ideal from the position of antipsychologism (objectivism), which is opposed to psychologism. The proponents of psychologism attributed the ideal only to the mind of an individual. Objectivists considered the existence of the ideal not only in the mind of a separate individual, but also outside of it, as a rule, allocating their own area for it in reality. But the objectivists also understood the objective existence of the ideal differently. E. Husserl connected the ideal with the pure laws of logic and mathematics, comprehended intuitively. G. Frege extended the ideal, including the laws of nature, linking it with the meaning of the sentence. He also formulated the concept of three regions of reality, including the ideal. K. Popper extended the ideal to cultural objects and also introduced the principles of evolutionism into the world of the ideal. M. A. Lifshits connected the ideal with all objects, both the natural and cultural. He pointed to the activity of the ideal in relation to the subject. E.V. Ilyenkov understood the ideal not as an abstract image, but as a form (scheme) of human activity in the rational transformation of the reality objects revealed in social practice. He believed that the ideal exists objectively in the forms of social consciousness.