The aspects of a subject and a concept in the Giorgione’s “The Tempest” interpretations
Abstract
Despite of almost 500 years of attempts to determine the subject of Giorgione’s “The Tempest” the specialists still fail to arrive to the common opinion about it. Yet there is no common trend in interpreting the painting. The article is dedicated to the analysis of several versions of reading this piece of art with due regard to the native and foreign traditions in art studies. There is a subdivision of those versions for “subject” type (S. Settis, E. Motzkin, M. Calvesi, N. Beloussova,) and for “concept” type (P. Vescovo, T. Sonina, Y. Yaylenko). Special attention is drawn to the authors’ methods and approaches (iconography, iconology, comparative analysis, research of historical and social context).
Keywords
Джорджоне,
«Гроза» Джорджоне,
Венеция,
Ренессанс,
пейзаж,
иконология,
иконография,
Giorgione,
“The Tempest”,
Venice,
Renaissance,
landscape,
iconology,
iconography
References
1. Anonimo Morelliano. Notizia d’opere di disegno nella prima metà del secolo XVI, esistenti in Padova, Cremona, Milano, Pavia, Bergamo, Crema e Venezia. Bassano, 1800.
2. Settis S. La “Tempesta” interpretata. Torino: Einaudi, 2013.
3. Motzkin E. Giorgione’s Tempesta // Gazette des beaux-arts, 6. 1993 (1498). Pér. 122. Р. 163-174.
4. Calvesi M. Giove Statore nella Tempesta di Giorgione e nella Camera di san Paolo del Correggio // Storia dell’arte. 1996. Vol. 86. P. 5-12.
5. Белоусова Н.А. Джорджоне: очерки о творчестве. М.: Изобразительное искусство, 1996. С. 82-106.
6. Vescovo P. La virtù e il tempo. Giorgione: allegorie morai, allegorie civili. Venezia, 2011. P. 51-105.
7. Сонина Т.В. Поэтическая трансформация мифа в картине Джорджоне «Гроза» // Миф в культуре Возрождения / Отв. ред. Л.М. Брагина. М.: Наука, 2003. С. 135-143.
8. Яйленко Е. Венецианская античность. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2010.
9. Burckhardt J. Der Cicerone: Eine Anleitung zum Genus der Kunstwerke Italiens. Leipzig, 1869.
10. Арас Д. Деталь в живописи. СПб., 2010. С. 396.
11. Howard D. Giorgione’s “Tempest” and Titian’s “Assunta” in the Context of the Cambrai Wars // Art history. 1895. Vol. 8. P. 271-289.
12. Rapp J. Die “Favola” in Giorgione’s “Gewitter” // Pantheon. 1988. Vol. 56. P. 405-418.
13. Holberton P. Giorgione’s Tempesta or Littele landscape with Storm and Gypsy: more on the Gypsy and Reassessment // Art History. 1995. Vol. 18. P. 383-403.
14. Minerbi P. de. La Tempesta di Giorgione e l’Amore sacro e l’Amore profane di Tiziano nello spirito umanista di Venezia. Milano, 1939.
15. Ferriguto A. Del nuovo su la “Tempesta” di Giorgione // Misura. Bergamo, 1946.
16. Смирнова И.А. Джорджоне да Кастельфранко. М., 1962.
17. Дьяков Л.А. Три шедевра Джорджоне // Художник. 1969. № 9. С. 57.
18. Wind E. Giorgione’s Tempesta. With Comments on Giorgione’s Poetic Allegories. Oxford, 1969.
19. Clark. K. Landscape into Аrt. L., 1949. Р. 56.
Review
For citations:
Ezernitskaya A. The aspects of a subject and a concept in the Giorgione’s “The Tempest” interpretations. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2015;(1):19-32. (In Russ.)
Views:
250
Email this article 