Distant Education. Students’ Point of View
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2021-3-99-109
Abstract
The perception of positive and negative features of the distance education by students of Moscow schools and universities is considered. By comparison of the sociological surveys data conducted before the pandemic and those done currently the author reveals a number of invariant difculties for students associated with adaptation to the general learning environment and interaction with the teacher. The main obstacles to the distance learning progress were the organizational unpreparedness of universities and schools, as well as the overload of the Internet and educational platforms. The reasons for the predominance of a positive attitude to distance learning over a negative one are the time-savings, increased mobility and the use of new opportunities for self-education.
About the Author
P. V. ShevchenkoRussian Federation
Pavel V. Shevchenko, Cand. of Sci. (Psychology), associate professor,
bld. 4, Vtoroi Selskokhozyaistvennyi Street, Moscow, 129226
References
1. Bulanova, M.B. (2021), “Precarious employment in higher education. Has the Rubicon been crossed?”, Toshchenko, Zh.T. (ed.), Prekarnaya zanyatost’: istoki, kriterii, osobennosti [Precarious employment. Origins, criteria, features], Ves’ mir, Moscow, Russia, pp. 161–181.
2. Fadeeva, E.V., Velikaya, N.M. and Belova, N.I. (2021), “Social well-being of Russians during the spread of the coronavirus disease”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 2, pp. 58–71.
3. Klimova, S.G. and Klimov, I.A. (2021), “Experience of Russian companies in transition to remote work in the pandemic situation”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], no. 7, pp. 50–60.
4. Oslon, A.A. (ed.) (2021), Sotsiologiya pandemii. Proekt koronaFOM [Sociology of the pandemic. The coronaFOM project], Institut fonda Obshchestvennoe mnenie, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Shevchenko P.V. Distant Education. Students’ Point of View. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2021;(3):99-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2021-3-99-109