Public legitimation of political power in the context of civil society transforming in modern Russia
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-59-71
Abstract
The issues of legitimizing the political regime are of particular importance in the conditions of transitional societies, when the preservation of the sustainable development trend becomes the most important condition and basis for the preservation of national security. The subject of the article is the legitimization of political power due to the level of trust and loyalty of the Russian population to a number of socio-political institutions at the present stage. The analysis of the data of monitoring studies conducted at the ISPR of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences allowed the author to state
That in society there remains a significant gap between trust in the institution of presidential and parliamentary power, and that a high level of distancing from government institutions and moderate loyalty associated with the need to maintain formal “order” are reproduced at a low level of trust. Given that the public legitimacy of the Russian political system is based on the president’s ratings, which retain a high potential, it can be assumed that the pseudoalternative election model will be preserved in the near future. At the same time, the dynamics of the level of trust and sympathy for a number of political institutions suggests the limit of opportunities for growth in the existing conditions of a system with a limited role of parties, what both reduces the space of free political discourse and limits the possibility of choice for citizens, which will threaten the legitimacy of the political regime.
About the Author
N. M. VelikayaRussian Federation
Nataliya M. Velikaya, Dr. of Sci. (Рolitical Science), professor
bld. 6 (1), Fotievoi Street, Moscow, 119333
References
1. Dakhin, A.V. (2019), “Political transit in Russia: Representative deliberative and participative system of public policy”, Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo instituta upravleniya, no 3, available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_41160504_46700875.pdf (Accessed 22 February 2022).
2. Il’icheva, L.E., Kondrashov, A.O. and Lapin, A.V. (2021), “Trust as a Bridge Over the Uncertainty Gap Between the Government and Society”, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no. 2, pp. 162–185, available at: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1917 (Accessed 22 February 2022).
3. Kolesnikov, A. and Makarenko, B. (2021), “Duma 2021: Four intrigues of elections”, Carnegie Moscow Center, available at: https://carnegie.ru/2021/05/31/rupub-84618 (Accessed 15 August 2021).
4. Korgunyuk, Yu.G. (2018) “Party system of modern Russia: Main trend of development”. Current problems of Europe, no 2, pp. 202-224.
5. Levashov, V.K. (ed.) (2021), Kuda idesh’, Rossiya? Ekspress-informatsiya [What is your image of future, Russia? Express information], Levashov, V.K., Velikaya, N.M., Shushpanova, I.S. [et al.], FNISTs RAN, Moscow, Russia, available at: http://испи.рф/wpcontent/uploads/2021/02/куда-идешь-россия-экспресс.pdf (Accessed 22 February 2022).
6. Levashov, V.K. (ed.) (2021), Kak zhivesh’, Rossiya? Ekspress-informatsiya [How are you, Russia? Express information. 51th stage of the sociological monitoring, June 2021] / Levashov, V.K., Velikaya, N.M., Shushpanova, I.S. [et al.], FNISTs RAN, Moscow, Russia, available at: https://www.fnisc.ru/publ.html?id=9956 DOI: 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-368-3.2021 (Accessed 22 February 2022).
7. Levashov, V.К. and Velikaya, N.М. (2021), “Russia’s Public Legitimacy in the Pandemic and the State Duma elections”, Social Area, vol. 7, no 4. pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2021.4.31.4
8. Milovanova, M.Yu. (2020), “Socially oriented non-profit organizations as an agent of social changes and new social design in modern Russia”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 1, pp. 74–84. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6401-2020-1-74-84.
9. Nisnevich, Yu.S. and Ryabov, A.V. (2016), “Modern Authoritarianism and Political Ideology”, POLIS. Political studies, no 4. pp. 162-181. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.04.13
10. Travin, D., Gelman, V. and Zaostrovtsev, A. (2019), Rossiskii Put’: Idei, Interesy, Instituty, Illjusii [Russian Way: Ideas, Interests, Institutes, Illusions], Izdatel’stvo Europeiskogo Universiteta, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
11. Velikaya, N.M. (2019), “Party system of modern Russia: Institutional frames and public legitimation”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series; no 1, pp. 108–119, DOI: 10.28995/2073-6401-2019-1-108-119
12. Vorob’eva, I.V. (2018), “Influence of informal employment on political attitudes of Russians”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Studies” Series, no. 4 (14). pp. 87–97, DOI: 10.28995/2073-6401-2018-4-87-97
13. Wiatr, J.J. (2017), “New and Old Authoritarianism in a Comparative Perspective”, STUDIA SOCJOLOGICZNO – POLITYCZNE. Seria Nowa, no. 2 (07), pp. 123–138, DOI: 10.26343/0585556X20707
14.
Review
For citations:
Velikaya N.M. Public legitimation of political power in the context of civil society transforming in modern Russia. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2022;(2):59-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-3-59-71