An artist and private customer in the 18th-century Paris. Survey on the development of portrait painting
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-4-111-131
Abstract
The interaction between a painter and his donator as a phenomenon of art history gives many opportunities to the research of social aspect of art. A private customer was isolated from any government institution such as the Academy of Painting and Sculpture. He did not pretend to be a connoisseur or adviser of painters but he had individual taste for art and his personally developed demands for it. As a field for dialog between painter and his patrons the portraiture appeared to become one of the most sought-after genres in 18th-century French society. The article aims to highlight a taste of an average French customer of the time showing how he wished to see himself and his loved ones on the canvas, what attributes he preferred to surround his person, how the client’s wishes coordinated with the creative ambitions and individual creative style of the artist were realized in the finished works .The author focuses on perception of the portrait painting by customers and some persons responsible to shaping and development of the ‘Academic doctrine’. The author of the article attentively scrutinized a wide gamut of sources, written by theoretical, critics, and connoisseurs, in which the tastes of private individuals and the painters who please them are subjected to a detailed critique. So the 18th-century portrait painting is produced as a result of collaboration of painters and private customers whose identity, formed under a social and cultural impact, needed adequate expression in the arts.
About the Author
E. E. AgratinaRussian Federation
Elena E. Agratina, Cand. of Sci. (Art Studies), associate professor
bld. 5, 2nd Frunzenskaya Street, Moscow, 119146
References
1. Corvisier, A. (1978), Arts et sociétés dans l’Europe du XVIIIe siècle, Presse universitaire de France, Paris.
2. Dumont-Wilden, L. (1909), Le portrait en France., G. van Oest & cie, Bruxelles.
3. Guichard, Ch. (2008), Les amateurs d’art à Paris au XVIIIe siècle. Seyssel, Champs Vallon.
4. Hedley, J. (2003), L’influence française sur l’art du portrait anglais au XVIIIe siècle, De soie et de poudre, Versailles, pp. 103–135.
5. Leroy, A. (1953), Maurice Quentin de La Tour et la société française du XVIIIe siècle, Edition Albin Michel, Paris.
6. Maurice Quentin de La Tour, Mademoiselle Ferrand meditiert über Newton, um 1752, Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen, Alte Pinakothek München, available at: http://www.sammlung.pinakothek.de/en/artwork/bwx062OGm8 (Accessed 16 November 2022).
7. Pommier, E. (1998), La théorie du portrait. De la Renaissance aux lumières, Gallimard, Paris.
8. Pomyan, K. (2022), Kollektsionery, lyubiteli i sobirateli. Parizh, Venetsiya: XVI– XVIII veka. [Collectors, connoisseurs, gatherers. Paris. Venice: 16th–18th centuries.], Izd-vo Evropeiskogo un-ta v Sankt-Peterburge, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
9. Renard, Ph. (2003), Portraits & autoportraits d’artistes au XVIIIe siècle, Renaissance du Livre, Paris.
10. Schieder, M. (2013), « Les Portraits sont devenus un spectacle nécessaire à chaque Français. Le discours esthétique sur le portrait au milieu du XVIIIe siècle (...) », Christian Michel and Carl Magnusson (eds.), Penser l’art dans la seconde moitié du XVIIIe siècle, Paris 2013, pp. 41–58.
11. Schneider, M. (2020), Belle comme Venus, Paris, Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, Centre allemand d’histoire de l’art (DFK Paris), available at: https://books. openedition.org/editionsmsh/24089 (Accessed 16 November 2022).
12. Zolotov, Yu.K. (1968), Frantsuzskii portret XVIII veka [The 18th-century French portrait painting], Iskusstvo, Moscow, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Agratina E.E. An artist and private customer in the 18th-century Paris. Survey on the development of portrait painting. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies. 2022;(4):111-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2022-4-111-131